> It's OK. It's good that you acknowladge the problem,
> this is the first step to recovery :)
We will see what AJ says about the 'global' trace function to see if I
resubmit or not (anyway, I forgot the '#undef FE' line, so I may resubmit
anyway).
> Not sure where to put this, we may need to ru
On March 28, 2004 11:52 am, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> > That's a nice effort, but this is real long name...
>
> I am corrupted by my day job's coding rules which encourages long function
> name (thank god Meta-/ exists :-) ).
It's OK. It's good that you acknowladge the problem,
this is the first step
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On March 28, 2004 5:22 am, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> > +static const char *EditWndProc_dump_msg_name(UINT msg)
>
> That's a nice effort, but this is real long name...
I am corrupted by my day job's coding rules which encourages long
On March 28, 2004 5:22 am, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> +static const char *EditWndProc_dump_msg_name(UINT msg)
That's a nice effort, but this is real long name...
What about dbgstr_msg()? Also, this is a real useful
function, I think we should have a standard dbgstr_msg()
function that knows about all s
