On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:30:17PM -0600, Erich Hoover wrote:
> > Honestly, I believe that this problem illustrates the need for these kind
> of
> > bugs - if I had found a bug for WinHttp in bugzilla assigned to Zac then
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:30:17PM -0600, Erich Hoover wrote:
> > Honestly, I believe that this problem illustrates the need for these kind
> of
> > bugs - if I had found a bug for WinHttp in bugzilla assigned to Zac then
> At the time I opened the bug that would not have done any good, the only
> thing I could have said at that time is that it failed on WinHttpOpen.
That's not quite no good. Just knowing that more than one app depends
on winhttp is often useful.
> Would you mind pointing me in the direction of Z
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to argue that the bug does not warrant closure, wine-devel
> does
> > not seem like an appropriate venue for such a discussion.
>
> It depends on the bug. The consensus seems to be that this bug is
> invalid, an
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:39 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly. You open a bug stating that 'Command & Conquere Red Alert 3
> fails to authenticate' and then add in a bug comment that the problem
> is because of missing required winhttp functionality. Zac then sees
> the bug
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:30:17PM -0600, Erich Hoover wrote:
> Honestly, I believe that this problem illustrates the need for these kind of
> bugs - if I had found a bug for WinHttp in bugzilla assigned to Zac then I
> could easily contact him. I do not have time to monitor wine-devel in order
>
> I am trying to argue that the bug does not warrant closure, wine-devel does
> not seem like an appropriate venue for such a discussion.
It depends on the bug. The consensus seems to be that this bug is
invalid, and I'm inclined to agree. A better bug would be something
about Command and Conque
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Erich Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to argue that the bug does not warrant closure, wine-devel does
> not seem like an appropriate venue for such a discussion. I am quite
> familiar with how much effort goes into properly implementing a full-fledg
I am trying to argue that the bug does not warrant closure, wine-devel does
not seem like an appropriate venue for such a discussion. I am quite
familiar with how much effort goes into properly implementing a full-fledged
library for working with HTTP, I have done it several times in several
langu
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Erich Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-10 18:43:16 ---
> This whole DLL has a total of 27 functions, 14 of which are currently exposed,
> and only 1 is "implement
10 matches
Mail list logo
