Chris Morgan wrote:
As we've discussed before I'd rather we did a single full pass of manual
testing than several full passes. It saves us time in that we don't have
to test the same things repeatedly like we would have to do when making
changes to things like classes that are used all over the
> > As we've discussed before I'd rather we did a single full pass of manual
> > testing than several full passes. It saves us time in that we don't have
> > to test the same things repeatedly like we would have to do when making
> > changes to things like classes that are used all over the code.
Chris Morgan wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:38 pm, Tony Lambregts wrote:
Chris Morgan wrote:
Yes, having quotes around limit values breaks sql queries. I'll
incorporate this into the injection change patch.
I'm curious as to why the rest of the patch is the same though. It
will conflict wh
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:38 pm, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Chris Morgan wrote:
> > Yes, having quotes around limit values breaks sql queries. I'll
> > incorporate this into the injection change patch.
> >
> > I'm curious as to why the rest of the patch is the same though. It
> > will conflict when
Chris Morgan wrote:
Yes, having quotes around limit values breaks sql queries. I'll
incorporate this into the injection change patch.
I'm curious as to why the rest of the patch is the same though. It
will conflict when the other sql patch is applied.
What other sql patch? How will it conflic
