amorozov wrote:
> Changed as directed Rob Shearman. Please use this instead of previous
> version of [6/9] patch.
Patchwatcher doesn't know what to do with partial
resends yet (eventually it will ignore them).
At the moment I have to delete them manually, else
patchwatcher gets confused and waits
> Patchwatcher doesn't know what to do with partial
> resends yet (eventually it will ignore them).
> At the moment I have to delete them manually, else
> patchwatcher gets confused and waits for the rest of the series.
> - Dan
I looked at patchwatcher results. Making patch [5/9] failed because af
> 2008/10/6 Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr)
> > USBD_CreateConfigurationRequestEx
>
> ...
>
> > +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr long long
> > long long long) USBD_ParseConfigurationDescriptorEx +@ stub
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The stdcall calli
2008/10/6 Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr) USBD_CreateConfigurationRequestEx
...
> +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr long long long long long)
> USBD_ParseConfigurationDescriptorEx
> +@ stub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The stdcall calling convention specifie
