Re: [6/10] winemapi: Add MAPIInitialize implementation.

2010-01-19 Thread Owen Rudge
On 18/01/2010 08:46, Alexandre Julliard wrote: This seemed to be the easiest and most trivial way to allow MAPIInitialize to succeed in the tests, which will be added in the next several patches. That doesn't seem right. The tests should be able to work without an extended provider. Indeed, u

Re: [6/10] winemapi: Add MAPIInitialize implementation.

2010-01-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andrew Nguyen writes: > Yes, the mapi32 prop and util tests on Wine don't require the extended > MAPI provider, but on Windows a MAPI provider must exist in order for > initialization to succeed. Without a provider, NT platforms simply > skip: > > prop.c:1380: Tests skipped: ScInitMapiUtil is not

Re: [6/10] winemapi: Add MAPIInitialize implementation.

2010-01-18 Thread Andrew Nguyen
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Andrew Nguyen writes: > >> This seemed to be the easiest and most trivial way to allow >> MAPIInitialize to succeed in the tests, which will be added in the >> next several patches. > > That doesn't seem right. The tests should be able

Re: [6/10] winemapi: Add MAPIInitialize implementation.

2010-01-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andrew Nguyen writes: > This seemed to be the easiest and most trivial way to allow > MAPIInitialize to succeed in the tests, which will be added in the > next several patches. That doesn't seem right. The tests should be able to work without an extended provider. -- Alexandre Julliard julli..