"Rob Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/7/23 Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> This isn't the most efficient implementation, but it works, and it should
>> not be difficult to tweak. Hence, I'd rather get this version in and add
>> the optimizations one at a time, in little patches.
Hi Dan,
2008/7/23 Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This isn't the most efficient implementation, but it works, and it should
> not be difficult to tweak. Hence, I'd rather get this version in and add
> the optimizations one at a time, in little patches. "Get it working first..."
Yes, I thin
