Vincent Povirk wrote:
> Does PrintDlgEx really use an interface with the same iid but
> different function signatures depending on whether the A or W version
> is called? If so, I think it would be best to define both versions, so
> that our tests and implementation can easily provide/use both.
>> And why bother checking UNICODE?
>
> Please clarify.
+MIDL_INTERFACE("509aaeda-5639-11d1-b6a1-f8757bf9")
+IPrintDialogServices : public IUnknown
+{
+#ifdef UNICODE
+virtual HRESULT STDMETHODCALLTYPE GetCurrentDevMode(LPDEVMODEW,UINT *) = 0;
+virtual HRESULT STDMETHODCALLTYPE GetCurr
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Why not use DECLARE_INTERFACE_ here?
Because it seemed simpler to me without it.
> And why bother checking UNICODE?
Please clarify.
--
Dmitry.
Why not use DECLARE_INTERFACE_ here? And why bother checking UNICODE?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> ---
> dlls/uuid/uuid.c | 1 +
> include/commdlg.h | 80
> +++
> 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
>
> diff --gi
