On Friday 15 August 2008 15:23:40 H. Verbeet wrote:
> Not necessarily wrong, but the common way to implement tables like
> this is to grow the table by some percentage of the original size, and
> keep a list of free handles.
Good point. I'll fix that when we have the basics of this dll covered.
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:41:36 Hans Leidekker wrote:
Sorry for the From address confusion. The CodeWeavers mail server
accused me of relaying but I found out now that it's because I forgot
to enable authenticated SMTP.
-Hans
2008/8/15 Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +HINTERNET alloc_handle( object_header_t *hdr )
> +{
> +object_header_t **p;
> +ULONG_PTR handle = 0, num;
> +
> +list_init( &hdr->children );
> +
> +EnterCriticalSection( &handle_cs );
> +if (!max_handles)
> +{
> +nu
