On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 08:23:06 -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
> > Just thought I'd give it a heads-up, maybe this is still an issue
> > that should at least be marked in the comments?
>
> I removed that comment because it's too strong. We have no idea what
> guarantees of randomness RtlGenRandom provi
Hello, I just randomly stumbled upon this old mail
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-May/017718.html
and I found the FIXME comment about (lack of) cryptographic quality
slightly worrying, so I had a quick look at the gitweb to see
what the implementation would look like these days
