Re: Announcing security hardened kernels for testing

2005-01-07 Thread pageexec
> Actually, we shouldn't be generating assembly code on the fly. If you > have more than say 16 proxies in a process then it is actually cheaper > in terms of memory usage and cache locality to have a set of compiled > entry points that can be shared by all proxies. It is even better if you > c

re: Announcing security hardened kernels for testing

2005-01-06 Thread pageexec
> http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/ntdll/ > > It's fairly harmless, there is some assembly in there but I don't > remember seeing any code which assumed an executable stack. i've looked at it and as i suggested yesterday, it's a false positive. what happens here is that relay32.s doesn't emit

re: Announcing security hardened kernels for testing

2005-01-05 Thread pageexec
> Thanks for the great info. I'll CC this to wine-devel as I think it's of > general interest, I hope you don't mind. sure, no problem (let's hope i don't bounce by not being subscribed ;-). > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/11/msg00206.html > > in which the PaX author and Ingo Molnar