Re: Windows 8 anyone?

EBC|X64|X86} Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Re: Windows 8 anyone?

install the consumer preview on my VirtualBox 4.1.8 the same way as the developer preview (2G of RAM, 40G of disk, 128M Video Memory, "Use host I/O cache" checked on the storage section). I can run your test if you want. Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Re: winscard

hout his dedication, this could languish for many years more! Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Re: winscard.dll

aders = (LPSTR*) mszReaders; Innocent source code editing can introduce big bugs if not done (and tested) properly! Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Re: winscard.dll

ne rely solely on the binary I provide or compiling their own using the original patch. Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Re: Winscard: Correct the declaration of SCardReleaseStartedEvent to match MSDN

Hi, You're right: I have done a small test and MSDN is indeed wrong on the definition of this function. Sorry for my erroneous patch. -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr On Wed, August 27, 2008 4:43 am, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Mounir IDRASSI" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Patch] 0001-Support-for-winscard.dll.patch

on it. The source from my side has evolved a little bit but it remains close to the original posting. I hope there will room for collaboration of this to provide a maximum number of Wine users with smart cards functionalities. Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr

Concerning Bug 11509 (AES Provider Handling for Windows XP)

ble szRSAName should be changed to "static const WCHAR szRSAName[4][66]" and its value appended at the end with the new name of the provider for XP instead of modifying the last field. This way, I'm sure the patch will be accepted. Vijay : can you submit a modified version of your patc

Re: wincrypt: add missing defines

You forgot the attachement... Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Juan Lang wrote: > --Juan > > > > > Choose the right car based on your

Re: advapi32: Allow setting CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT and CRYPT_NEWKEYSET in CryptAcquireContext

nh is straightforward: in the code of RSAENH_CPAcquireContext, juste add the line "case CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT | CRYPT_NEWKEYSET:" above the existing line "case CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT:". Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >

Re: CryptAcquireContext can have multiple flags defined at the same time, V2

you please send the patching code along with the test to the patches list?. Thanks for pointing this behavior. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hello, > > After retrying, I tried the same function arguments

Re: gdiplus: added stub implementation of gdiplus.dll

Hi, You also have to modify other files in order to integrate your stub implementation to the wine build chain: Makefile.in, configure and configure.ac in the wine root directory, Makefile.in in the "dlls" directory. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://ww

Re: rsaenh: AcquireContext can have multiple flags defined at the same time

MSDN that CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT is reserved for non persistent operations which is not the case when you create a new container. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > According to msdn a combination of flags are set, since I'm not sure &

Re: winscard: add pcsc-lite helpers for upcoming implementation (try 2)

running under a 64bit host and pcsclite is compiled on 64bit mode...but I think this is a more global issue. Am I missing something? Please advise. Thanks. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Alexandre Julliard wrote: > I don't think the pcsc-lit

re: winscard: add pcsc-lite helpers for upcoming implementation

The code is definitely cleaner with all your suggestions. I'm applying them now. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr > James wrote: >> This would be a lot cleaner as: >> >> if (!(liteSCardEstablishContext = (SCardEstablis

Re: winscard: add pcsc-lite helpers for upcoming implementation

whole implementation. Concerning the BOOL return value, it's here for "historical" reasons. I'll remove it. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://.idrix.fr > +BOOL InitializePCSCLite(void) > > You don't use the return value: > >

Re: winscard: small stub implementation of winscard dll (Try 2)

Hi Alexandre, You are completely right...these variables are definitely useless!! I don't remember when I coded that but it must have been very late at night! Anyway, I'll purge them from the patch. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr

Re: winscard stub dll

Hi Francois, Thanks for your modifications. I'll review your patch and submit it if I have no comments, ِCheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Francois Gouget wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a new version of the patch that removes the

Re: winscard stub dll

Hi, Apart from Alexandre comment, I don't see any other possible changes. So, if the first patch containing the API headers is OK, I can submit the winscard stub patch. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Francoi

Re: crypt32: remove hardcoded value AT_SIGNATURE from CertContext_SetKeyProvInfo

g on that and I'll send a correct patch soon. I analogize for my misunderstanding. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Like I said, the test currently passe

Re: rsaenh: add support for mandatory parameters to RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

complete patch would include also a correction to this file. Question: can a patch include corrections to different dlls? I can submit it now. Cheers Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

Re: rsaenh: fix bug in RSAENH_CPGetProvParam (corrected)

Hi Juan, Thanks for your explanations. I'm resubmitting the patch. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Juan Lang wrote: > Yes, certainly. See e.g. recent patches from Paul Vriens to get the tests > succeeding on Win9x. > --Juan >

Re: rsaenh: fix bug in RSAENH_CPGetProvParam (corrected)

wine tests meant to be run on Windows? This is the only case for the test to fail. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Juan Lang wrote: > Hi Mounir, > > +case PP_KEYSTORAGE: > +dwTemp = CRYPT_SEC_DES

Re: RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

Actually, the only application I know that uses this expects only CRYPT_SEC_DESCR. So, as you advised, I'll rewrite the patch to remove the version check. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAI

Re: rsaenh: fix critical bug in read_key_container

I'll take you advice from now and I apologize for any annoyance caused by my previous emails. I would also thank all the people who took time to review our patches and sent me their comments/remarks. Regards, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idr

Re: rsaenh: fix critical bug in read_key_container

yes but I prefer sending patches first to the devel list for comments. Once no major issue is raised, I send it to the patches list. I think this helps prevent polluting the patches list. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Stefan Dösinger wrote: >

Re: rsaenh: fix bugs in RSAENH_CPAcquireContext and RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

Thanks for your reply. I'm rewriting the patches and sending them back. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > I have no Idea about the code, but the missing defines should > be a seperate patch. > > Your iden

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr

rsaenh: fix critical bug in read_key_container

is a patch correcting this bug and adding a test that demonstrate it. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr >From 8da78d912c0a709a641ae4082ee6df270f644a08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 7 May 2

crypt32: fix a wrong test

Hi, In the tests of the crypt32 dll, a test was written in a way that accommodates the bug we have corrected previously in the patch for rsaenh dll. The attached small patch corrects the value expected from this test to be consistent with the correct output. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX

Re: rsaenh: fix bugs in RSAENH_CPAcquireContext and RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

Hi, Thanks Maarte for your comment. Please find attached the patch augmented with some tests that illustrate what has been corrected. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > I don't see any tests added in this patch so it

rsaenh: fix bugs in RSAENH_CPAcquireContext and RSAENH_CPGetProvParam

_TYPE, PP_KEYSTORAGE. In order to support the PP_KEYSTORAGE parameter, we added three defined to wincrypt.h. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr >From a7240539a2e3c83291c7cf206d55f1e4e7e75803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mounir IDRASSI

Bug in Advapi32: CryptEnumProviderTypesA and CryptEnumProvidersA

ounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr >From ab7323952138e725700ded1bad4afd17e42717e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 20:20:59 +0200 Subject: Correct bug in CryptEnumProviderTypesA and CryptEnumPr

Re: Adding header files for the implementation of Winscard dll (Smart Cards support)

Sorry, my mistake... I'll definitely be more careful next time. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > This is a notice more for Alexandre this time, but next time please > make sure to send the files with exec bits

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

Hi, Please find attached the patch for adding header files for the support of smart cards through Winscard dll. If it's OK, should I post it elsewhere? Thanks in advance. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Eric Pouech wrote: > > sorr

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

gnore them if they report an error. That's why we must implement them all. But I can start with stubs in the spec file for the first patch. I'll wait for your reply before submitting the first patch. Thanks. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.f

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

oups ...sorry...It was my fault! You are as absolutely right. Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Eric Pouech wrote: > they should work across the whole buffer > are you sure you don't pass -1 as the length for the input buffer ? > A+ >

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

r and WideCharToMultiString don't understand multi-strings ( MSDN say nothing about that). Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Eric Pouech wrote: > you have to ensure that binary compat is present for both pcsc-lite > and MS APIs > if not, then you'll

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

fference we see with msvcrt source is that winscard exported variables have a structure as a type, whereas msvcrt exported variables are pointers. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX – Cryptography and IT Security Experts http://www.idrix.fr Eric Pouech wrote: > from a cursory look, it looks a very go

Re: Winscard support (for smart cards)

since we are not really experts in autoconf and libtool scripts, we started from a pre-configured source tree and adapted the files of the cryptdll library (the simplest one). So we will definitely need the help of the community to integrate our source seamlessly into the wine source tree. Mou

Winscard support (for smart cards)

community. However, we would like to known the reason behind the lack of winscard support. Is it simply because no one needed it before or maybe there is an issue with the pcsc-lite license? Thanks in advance for your information. Cheers, Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr