Re: Startup time of OOo2, Firefox 1.5. Some surprises.

2006-02-15 Thread michael meeks
Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:33 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Well, but that was a rather rough-shot reply, and your reply to that > (if it was valid) was quite important, so for now it seems he doesn't have > too much of a point here. So my personal feeling (having never used it)

Re: Startup time of OOo2, Firefox 1.5. Some surprises.

2006-02-15 Thread michael meeks
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:34 -0500, Dimi Paun wrote: > > As you say though - convincing Ulrich it is a good idea > > is the main challenge here :-) > > What's the status of that effort BTW? :) Hard to say; the sole insightful prognostication available is: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils

Re: Startup time of OOo2, Firefox 1.5. Some surprises.

2006-02-13 Thread michael meeks
gt; > 28 ooo run2 wine 96MB It takes you 28 secs to warm-start OO.o ? that's pretty amazing ;-) it's ~4 seconds for me. > I suspect the reason is the slow shared library > loading that Michael Meeks is working on fixing. > Once that's in (if he can convince U