Wow, just like that!
James Hawkins wrote:
>> It is shocking to most FOSS code writers that maybe this is a real,
>> truly, paid for project. "No! It can not be! I contribute to someones
>> profit? NOO~~~!".
>
The above is a famous quote I read from Linux Journal magazine.
>
> I am well a
James Hawkins wrote:
> On 9/25/06, jimtabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Every Wine developer needs to read this,
>> http://www.codeweavers.com/services/ and
>> http://www.codeweavers.com/services/wine .
>>
>
> I'm a Wine developer, a
Hi,
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>
> How many projects have you ever participated in? Every developers'
> mailing list
> of an open source I personally participated in *doesn't guarantee* not
> only patch
> acceptance, but even a reply with explanations why the patch has been
> silently
> dropped, an
Hi!
Hello
>Codeweavers version of Wine has changes that Alexandre deems
>unacceptable for the "clean" WineHQ tree.
If this is that way, it would be real a horror. Why are code patches
which allows a huge major app (key application) to run on linux
"unacceptable" (From point of view of the MS
Julien wrote:
/ I was very interested in comparing the implementation status of reactos
/>/ and wine. So I coded a little python script to list all the api that are
/>/ implemented in reactos AND are only stub in wine. Attached to this mail
/>/ is the list of identified functions.
/>/
/>/ One
