Tom, you can try to guilt me, but I don't care.
There are two sides to this. Either you think that #winehq is a
support channel for end users, and should if not cater to them, at
least treat them with some respect until they've proved that they
deserve none, or you think that #winehq is a channel w
Actually, Dan, I disagree. I don't think he needs to be taken off the
'frontlines' at all. I don't even think his ops permissions need to be taken
away, at least not yet. I think it's #winehq which needs to be taken care
of. We could ban Vitamin off the face of the internet, but that's not going
to
t; > > #winehq instead of just complaining about the work of one of the very few
> > > people who actually are out there helping users.
> >
> > As I understand this history feba thatl tried to do exactly that: help
> > others on our user channel... and got banned by v
>The line above is very important. I think it had to be sent to the channel.
>Please imagine yourself saying:
>(09:33:15 PM) vitamin: usrl, this will not help, as 0.9.47 and 0.9.48 are
>still broken for most Source games.
See, exactly. There is no reason to kick someone for making a comment
and t
Sorry if this mailing list is less than appropriate, but from what
I've seen this is where the conversation was last time, and there
doesn't seem to be much better.
A while ago (Probably one-three months), I went to #winehq to ask
about something, and was treated rather rudely by vitamin. I got
an
