Re: schannel: Implement SpUserModeInitialize

2007-04-25 Thread Yuval Fledel
On 24/04/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/24/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/24/07, Yuval Fledel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > +if (LsaVersion != 0x1) > > What is 0x1? If it's not

Re: schannel: Tests for Sp[Lsa,User]ModeInitialize and GetInfo

2007-04-25 Thread Yuval Fledel
On 24/04/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/24/07, Yuval Fledel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +#if 0 +/* NULL parameters: All 3 crash as of Windows XP */ +status = pSpLsaModeInitialize(0x1, NULL, &pTables, &cTables); +status = pSpLsaModeInitiali

Re: schannel: Implement SpUserModeInitialize

2007-04-25 Thread Yuval Fledel
just to follow the wrong test. James Hawkins -- Yuval Fledel

Re: schannel: Move schannel tests from secur32 to the recent schannel

2007-04-22 Thread Yuval Fledel
On 22/04/07, Robert Shearman wrote: Yuval Fledel wrote: > Move schannel tests from secur32 to the recent schannel. Adding a > tests directory on the way. I don't see the point in this. The actual functionality is implemented in secur32, so it makes sense for the tests to also be t

Re: secur32: invert error handling conditions in order to decrease indentation in secur32/wrapper.c.

2007-04-20 Thread Yuval Fledel
#x27;m very interested to see progress in this area. Thanks! I'm silently tracking your work in this area for years (and later Kai's). I was just busy with another open source project. I dropped from that one and now I have time for wine :-). --Juan -- Yuval Fledel

secur32: invert error handling conditions in order to decrease indentation in secur32/wrapper.c.

2007-04-18 Thread Yuval Fledel
On Saturday 14 April 2007 00:56, Yuval Fledel wrote: > - the patch is a no-op. While I like to do the same to functions I work on, is there any reason you need to change this for wrapper.c? It hasn't been changed for quite a while and seems feature complete. Kai Hi Kai, Please repl