Re: Why winetools is utterly useless, once and for all.

Tom Spear wrote: > Java, anyone? lol oh wait wait I got one better.. Fortran... or no, > how about... COBOL!! LMFAO gimme a break.. > > Seriously though, why not break winedoors up into different > components, and then have different submaintainers, and each component > can be wri

Re: Application database

look more carefully into those things before sending retarded sounding email. Chris On Thursday 11 March 2004 10:27 pm, Tom Williams wrote: I just added a new application, called TweakPNG, to the app database. :) I don't know if my submission was accepted or not. Peace... Tom

Re: Application database

I just added a new application, called TweakPNG, to the app database. :) I don't know if my submission was accepted or not. Peace... Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I too think we need to support the appdb. Perhaps we should setup some kind of application submission interface where users c

Re: wine-20040213 doesn't compile on Linux w/ 2.6.3 kernel and gcc-3.3.3

Thanks for the info. I tried building wine with __KERNEL__ after I posted my message and got past this problem but encountered TONS more so that was obviously NOT the solution. :) I'll look into doing what you describe below. :) Peace... Tom P. Christeas wrote: I had found the same problem

wine-20040213 doesn't compile on Linux w/ 2.6.3 kernel and gcc-3.3.3

I had successfully built wine-20040213 before upgrading to the 2.6.3 Linux kernel and XFree86 4.4.0. After upgrading to XFree86 4.4.0 (from source distribution), wine would crash when I would try to run a Windows app so I decided to rebuild wine so it would use the XFree86 4.4.0 headers and li