On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Timothy Normand Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to build rc4 for MacOS (Leopard),
> and I'm running into some problems, and I hope I'm not a bother to ask
> for some help.
>
> When I do ./configure, I get the following messages:
>
> onfigure: WAR
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Stephen Eilert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any specific procedures or utilities to instrument and
> generate profiling reports?
This is indirectly related to your question, but I'd really love to
see better DTrace support for Windows applications running
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darren wrote:
> > Should I try to take the dll test structure (mainly just the
> > dlls/Maketest.rules.in file) and port this into the programs area?
> >
> > or is that overboard for that area?
>
> It's something we need e
On 10/29/06, Jimmy W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got a simple problem, that got really hard to fix.
I am trying to cross-compile stuff over a Makefile with ms compiler.
Problem is that when make are executing wine as a command, wine
segfaults.
An example:
# wine --version
Works!
But:
Mak
On 10/10/06, Segin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It took some good hydro from Holland and about 6 hours of trying to
write a program that could syncronize multiple instances of itself using
IPC and signals (so it could run on Minix 3, where pthreads sadly
doesn't exist, so it was a threading hack of
On 8/4/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tommy's APC version of his
> VirtualAllocEx / CreateRemoteThread patch
> seems to be safe (since APCs only run a points where threads
> in well-written programs are not holding locks),
Unfortunate
On 8/3/06, Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just one thing - can you try
> it with something copy protected? I think some programs rely on being able
> to CreateRemoteThread into a program that runs all the time and nev
On 8/3/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just one thing - can you try
it with something copy protected? I think some programs rely on being able
to CreateRemoteThread into a program that runs all the time and never
sleeps (eg games that try and get the highest FPS possible).
Do you know
5-3-421246.html
Lastly, I should mention that I have two pending patches to add conformance
tests for remote processes operations:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-July/029259.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-July/029260.html
Thanks,
Thomas Kho
---
in
?
Thomas Kho
---
dlls/kernel/thread.c | 42 +-
dlls/ntdll/Makefile.in |1
dlls/ntdll/loader.c|1
dlls/ntdll/ntdll.spec |4 +
dlls/ntdll/ntdll_misc.h| 73 +++
dlls/ntdll/server.c|3
dlls/ntdll/service.c
On 7/21/06, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Thomas Kho wrote:
[...]
> A fake notepad.exe is currently created in c:\windows\system32. I
> don't think there's duplication of CreateProcess because CreateProcess
> considers the filename of
thread. Both threads continue and any
contention would be handled in the already thread-safe manner.
Thomas Kho
ludes addressing the FIXMEs
sprinkled in the patch and adding the ifdefs to make sure the code path is only
turned on in Linux/x86 systems.
Thomas Kho
---
dlls/kernel/kernel32.spec |3 +
dlls/kernel/thread.c | 168
dlls/ntdll/thr
On 7/11/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Kho wrote:
> On 7/6/06, Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> wcmd: strip quotes around executable and retry on error
>> wcmd currently gives a 'File not found' error for the comma
On 7/6/06, Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wcmd: strip quotes around executable and retry on error
wcmd currently gives a 'File not found' error for the command:
`./wine wcmd /c "notepad test.txt"` because it only tries to execute the
program "notepad t
On 7/1/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Thomas Kho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking into what would be required for something like a
> symlink to wcmd.exe, but at the same time I'm wondering the historical
> reason
On 6/30/06, H. Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30/06/06, Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not 100% clear what the problem is. My interpretation of your
> first email was that there was a necessary distinction in type between
> user/gdi handles as stored
stance of cmd.exe in Windows
does not open a new console window--using an existing console, be it
unix or dos, seems to be the right thing to do.
Thomas Kho
* interactive use (which is what most programs look in COMSPEC
* for).
*/
I'm currently looking into what would be required for something like a
symlink to wcmd.exe, but at the same time I'm wondering the historical
reasons for choosing 'wcmd' and if it should be changed to just 'cmd'.
Thomas Kho
On 6/30/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Kho wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thomas, can you regenerate this patch using "void *" for bmpitem (or
>> perhaps add a new gdi_handle_t type)?
>
>
On 6/30/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas, can you regenerate this patch using "void *" for bmpitem (or
perhaps add a new gdi_handle_t type)?
I'll add the gdi_handle_t type and resubmit two patches (I caught
another use in the menu struct).
Tommy
On 6/19/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This needs to be cleaned up a lot more before it will be accepted.
For a start, the members of this structure need to be cleaned up. Some
of the members of the POPUPMENU structure are for keeping track of the
menu while it's in use (bTimeToH
s the
reply would be callee-allocated, caller-freed (or perhaps we could
take advantage of SERVER_END_REQ?). However, it seems kind of natural
to have the request process parallel the reply process.
Is there another alterative? Any comments on which approach is better?
Thomas Kho
It seems that it is not currently possible to get the exit code of a
unix program executed with _wspawnv(_P_WAIT, [unix app], [args])
because CreateProcess() does not return a handle to the new process.
_wspawnv() uses the handle to WaitForSingleObject() the end of
execution and also needs it to G
On 4/27/06, Mike McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This patch adds a test to the menu conformance test to point out some bugs. I
> submitted a patch earlier that contained both this test and three fixes; I'm
> redoing it piecemeal this time.
I think splitting it u
On 4/14/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tommy Kho wrote:
> >This patch changes the behavior of selecting greyed out menu items via
> >accelerator key. Wine currently keeps the menu open; Windows closes the menu.
> > ...
> > else
> >+{
> > pmt->hCurrentMenu = MENU_ShowSubPop
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:23:40 +0900, "Mike McCormack"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you're submitting the patch, make sure to send it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as that's the only place that patches will be
> picked up from.
Will do with this (smaller) patch!
> * You linked the test with "riched20
/socket.c
After: 46.38% of file dlls/winsock/socket.c
http://hkn.icsl.ucla.edu/~tom/socket_c_2.gcov.txt
We'd also appreciate other targets to test.
Thanks for your help,
Thomas Kho
Files available at:
http://www.geekymedia.com/viewcvs/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/wine4/wine/dlls/winsock/tests/
Changelog:
% of 1839 lines executed in file socket.c
After (select() server code):
41.16% of 1839 lines executed in file socket.c
http://hkn.icsl.ucla.edu/~tom/socket.c.gcov.txt
We'd also appreciate other targets to test. Currently we plan to add
tests for sendto, recvfrom, and getservbyname.
Thanks for yo
Thanks for your help,
Thomas Kho
cc: Fredy Garcia, Douglas Rosenberg (group members)
Files available at:
http://www.geekymedia.com/viewcvs/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/wine4/wine/dlls/wsock32/tests/
wsock32_test.patch
Description: Binary data
30 matches
Mail list logo
