On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> We can make this feature (passing O_DENY* flags received from clients
>> to filesystem) can be turned on/off on Samba/NFS server to let this
>> particular use case work. In general, I think we really need to be
>> sure that nobody has a read acce
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Steve French wrote:
> although I could not find the same level of detail that MS-FSA
> provides (e.g. see section 2.14.10 for the detailed
Typo It is section 2.1.4.10
--
Thanks,
Steve
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:49:49PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:26:28 +0400
>> Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>>
>> > Network filesystems CIFS, SMB2.0, SMB3.0 and NFSv4 have such flags - this
>> > change can benefit cifs and nfs
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> preferred minimum IO size (mp->m_readio_log/mp->m_writeio_log)
This discussion about i/o sizes is very interesting. For network
file system (at least for SMB2 to all known servers, and
for cifs mounts to Samba, but probably for recent NFS),
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Steve French wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Myklebust, Trond
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:03 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Myklebust, Trond
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Th
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Myklebust, Trond
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:03 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Myklebust, Trond
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:56 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 26
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:28 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:45:54PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Steve French wrote:
>>
>> > I also would prefer that we simply treat the time granularity as part
>> > of the superblock (mounted volume)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Myklebust, Trond
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:56 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Myklebust, Trond
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 09:54 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Ap
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:47 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Steve French wrote:
>
>> This patch reminds me of a question on time stamps - how can an
>> application query the time granularity ie sb_s_time_gran for a mount
>> (e.g. 1 second for some file systems, 100 nano
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Myklebust, Trond
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 09:54 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> > Steve French wrote:
>> >
>> >> Would it be better to make the stable vs vo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:25 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Steve French wrote:
>
>> Would it be better to make the stable vs volatile inode number an attribute
>> of the volume or something returned by the proposed xstat?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by a stable vs a
umber of uses:
>>
>> (1) Creation time: The SMB protocol carries the creation time, which could
>> be
>> exported by Samba, which will in turn help CIFS make use of FS-Cache as
>> that can be used for coherency data.
>>
>> This is als
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:05 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Implement a pair of new system calls to provide extended and further
> extensible
stat functions.
> Should the default for a network fs be to do an unconditional (heavyweight)
> stat with a flag to suppress going to the server to update
This patch reminds me of a question on time stamps - how can an
application query the time granularity ie sb_s_time_gran for a mount
(e.g. 1 second for some file systems, 100 nanoseconds for cifs/smb2, 1
nanosecond for others etc.)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:06 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Return ex
For some of our users this would help A LOT.
Interesting ... just had discussions yesterday with some guys trying
to migrate to Linux and another set trying to backup Windows/NetApp
from Linux.
Some things they brought up that they needed (beyond what we already
have wth the cifs acl and SID and
15 matches
Mail list logo
