On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Apparently it is not easily possible (even if one could compile
> wine-gecko, .cab creation would be an obstacle).
>
> Therefore I've packaged the Wine provided prebuilt binary .cab as
> wine-gecko, and put it into the "non-free" repository
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Sir Gallantmon skrev:
> > Sorry, I think of the word "toolchain" differently I guess. I always
> > considered a toolchain to include both tools and common libraries, as
> > Fedora did. I was aware of the MinGW
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Sir Gallantmon skrev:
> > I don't think I have seen any distribution include wine-gecko. Fedora
> > seems to be in the best position to finally make a wine-gecko package,
> > since it now provides a MinGW toolchai
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Ben Klein skrev:
> > Have you looked at my wine-gecko-1.0.0 package at the lamaresh.net
> > repository? It's just the pre-packaged cab file stored in
> > /usr/share/wine/gecko.
>
> That's the reason I'm not looking at it.
>
>
>
I don't think I
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Roderick Colenbrander <
thunderbir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Stefan Dösinger
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 06.12.2009 um 23:21 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> >> I wouldn't be surprised if this still was the case, we could keep the
> midi interface
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The apocalypse approaches:
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/01/0025213
>
> Perhaps this will drive people towards using totally locked down systems...
>
>
>
Or just cause more insanity
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Sir Gallantmon
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >> > What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or
> >> > handling only
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> 임은지 wrote:
>
> > What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or handling
> only performance critical items in kernel?
>
> There has long been talk of doing that. Linus is
> even willing to take patches to implement win32 APIs
