Please let's not post with a title like "Re: Windows 2000 source code
has been leaked", and then send an empty message with a nondescript
text file attachment.
Ouch!
Hi all,
I decided to investigate this old bug:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/12/0158.html
even though Alexander removed thread initialization from x11drv. So the
first thing I did was apply this patch:
Index: x11drv_main.c
==
Patch submitted.
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Pouech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Strange debug message in programs/winedbg/info.c
>
Hi,
The debugger kept messing up my output because of a missing
newline. This patch fixes that. However, the condition checks for
first_dll, but the output says first_option. They can't both be right.
So which one should it be?
info.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi all,
I'm getting this message over and over while attempting an update from the
wine cvs repository: "cvs server: [13:31:41] waiting for wineowner's lock
in /home/wine/wine" I'm guessing a CVS process has died and left a stale
lock in the repository. Could someone check it out?
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: Build fails for current CVS update
> "Sami Aario" <
- Original Message -
From: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:55 AM
Subject: Build fails for current CVS update
> Hi,
>
> Building with tools/wineinstall fails with the latest CVS update on my
>
Hi,
Building with tools/wineinstall fails with the latest CVS update on my
system with the following:
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D__WINE
SRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-stri
ct-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g
- Original Message -
From: "Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with x11drv_main.c version 1.83
> No, I don't thi
> Sami Aario wrote:
>
> >Hi list,
> >
> >Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This
patch
> >removes
> >the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message:
> >"x11drv: Can't
> >open dis
Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This patch
removes
the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message:
"x11drv: Can't
open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to version
1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be g
> My kernel is the Debian sarge default kernel, 2.2.20. I get zero zombies.
Oops, should be Debian woody.
From: "Paul Millar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Zombies (was : Conformance tests...)
> Looks suspiciously like the 2.6.0
From: "Sylvain Petreolle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Millar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sami Aario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Zombies (was : Confor
> BTW, why aren't
there any preexisting patches for ddraw?
Oops, "patches" should read "tests".
--
Sami
Hi,
I'd like to write some conformance tests for ddraw,
and I notice that there
aren't any
preexisting tests. What is the preferred way of setting up the
"tests" subdirectory
(makefiles)? Do I just do it by hand?
BTW, why aren't
there any preexisting patches for ddraw? Would my tests
pos
Hi,
The conformance tests fail for the 20031016 build on my system with the
following error message:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M user32.dll -T ../../.. -p
user32_test.exe.so msg.c && touch msg.ok
msg.c:333: Test failed: ShowWindow:overlapped: in msg 0x0047 expecting wParam
0x47 got
17 matches
Mail list logo
