on of the two patches has been resubmitted.
Peace,
-Roy
_NULL for the test. This allows me to avoid linking
uuid into the test for a single GUID.
I've sent in a revised patch set with this revision and the other
revisions mentioned.
Thanks for the comments!
-Roy
ed to be closing the socket "s" with a call to
"closesocket"? Be sure to do this on both regular and error paths if
it's needed. You can look at "test_ipv6only" for an example of using
the infamous "goto out;" used throughout wine to handle cleanup when
exiting a test early.
Peace,
-Roy
Broken patch set :( Please disregard this sequence (1-3) of patches.
I'll send a revised version out later today.
Peace,
-Roy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Roy Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ---
> dlls/mstask/Makefile.in |2 +
> dlls/mstask/mstask_main.c
Hello Vincent,
Looks like you've some DOS line breaks mixed into this patch through the
register_parent_wnd_class function. Not sure if you meant to do that.
Peace,
-Roy
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Vincent Povirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> What's with the weird spacing?
Thanks for the catch. I spaced on the spacing. Revised patch with
corrected spacing is attached.
Peace,
-Roy
From 11425fd623f6375937b3d97c8d682506cc08d39a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roy Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:13:33
into a cleaner way to add the mstask registry
data into wine?
Thanks!
-Roy
diff --git a/tools/wine.inf.in b/tools/wine.inf.in
index 3e3a625..5ee5d0b 100644
--- a/tools/wine.inf.in
+++ b/tools/wine.inf.in
@@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ HKCR,https\shell\open\ddeexec,"NoActivateHandler",2,""
ntation, setting extra flags should not be a problem.
But for full conformance with Windows, you may not have this
flexibility.
Best of luck!
-Roy
e desktop with a new and clean .wine
folder, but this still has the same result.
It at least happens with 0.9.49 and 0.9.50.
Could somebody give me a hint on how to proceed in figuring this out?
Thanks in advance,
Roy
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:37:50PM -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 3:21 PM, Roy Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a revised and standalone version of svchost patch. Changes in
> > this revision include:
> >
> > - Unicode based with a simp
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:31:31PM -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 6:19 PM, Roy Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > This is another resend of the BITS patch set. This resend changes
> > svnhost to be ANSI based, merges patches 2
fined." So in practice the undefined behavior is benign?
Peace,
-Roy
hen I have a stub implementation of
BITS using svchost ready.
Thanks for any pointers!
-Roy
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:21:42PM -0800, Roy Shea wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:00:28PM +, Robert Shearman wrote:
> > Roy Shea wrote:
> > >Howdy All,
> > >
> > >I'm developing missing services in Wine and am running into problems
> > >wi
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:00:28PM +, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Roy Shea wrote:
> >Howdy All,
> >
> >I'm developing missing services in Wine and am running into problems
> >with how Wine starts services. In Windows a service can be started
> >using &quo
collection of a known bug in Wine along these
lines where, as a work around, clients are manually starting servers.
Anyone know more details on this problem? Any pointers to old emails
or knowledge of this problem would be a big help I start digging
through WINEDEBUG logs.
Thanks!
-Roy
drop me an email and I'll clean up the docs.
Peace,
-Roy
these includes throuh windows.h.
Peace,
-Roy
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Roy Shea wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The REGISTER_PROXY_DLL_ROUTINES macro defined in rpcproxy.h calls
> DisableThreadLibraryCalls. This patch adds two header files needed
> for calls to DisableThr
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:09:36PM -0700, Roy Shea wrote:
> (1) Shall I add bits to wine in dlls/bits or dlls/qmgr? I recommend
> the former, since current Windows documentation refers to "bits". But
> this may confuse folks who don't understand the tie between qmgr and
. Off the top of my head I think this
will look the same to applications wanting to use bits. However, I'm
new to the COM world and may be overlooking something...
Thanks for the advice,
-Roy
Howdy,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Stefan D?singer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 27. September 2007 12:58:46 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> > Roy Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Resubmission of a bare bones bits implementation.
> >
> > There i
-U
option:
.idl_i.c:
$(WIDL) $(IDLFLAGS) -u -U $@ $<
which is a great idea, but uses the full path to the original idl when renaming
the file. Probably good for the general case, but not for me.
Thanks for the advice!
-Roy
Howdy,
Resubmission of bits skeleton with a DLL_WINE_PREATTACH case added to
DllMain. Thanks for the advice!
Peace,
-Roy
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:57:45AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello Roy,
>
> Roy wrote:
> > This patch provides a first skeleton version of bits.dl
23 matches
Mail list logo
