I've now moved this thread to the wine-license list. I probably should have posted
there in the first place - an oversight on my part. Sorry.
Anyway . . .
> this license they can.
> > Under GPL and BSD the developer has absoutely no control or means to keep
> their work an open source becaus
Sent this to winehq.com, so sending it to winehq.org in case it bounces.
On 2004.01.24 17:24 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Richard Schilling wrote:
> > I would like to present to you all a new Open Source software license I've written
> > up.
> [ ... ]
>
> One the face of i
On 2004.01.24 17:24 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Richard Schilling wrote:
> > I would like to present to you all a new Open Source software license I've written
> > up.
> [ ... ]
>
> One the face of it, Section III, "Distribution Restrictions and Obligations."
uncement.
>
> What are you trying to achieve with this, which can't already be
> achieved through BSD or [L]GPL licensing schemes?
>
I am trying to make it possible for people to earn a living as Open Source developers.
I am also making it possible for companies that do Open Source development as their
primary activiey to provide jobs to those (like those on this list) who invest their
time into Open Source products.
Richard
> > Richard Schilling
>
> --
> Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
>
>
>
>
orks.
# The software is always downloaded from the same place by the end user even if it's
used as part of a larger product, protecting the quality of the software.
Please feel free to contact me on or off list about this announcement.
Richard Schilling
