>You are asking for stable interfaces and those can only come once there
>is a Wine 1.0. Its not here and dont get me wrong I think the Wine TODO
>list is way to long and things should be close to frozen by now but
>thats not the case. All you are doing is pointing out that its not
>stable which i
om Wine. So, you can see it's really just a small step to then
drop Wine and handle the management of Windows ourselves instead of using
Wine for it.
Not trying to be rude either. You asked, I answered.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: "Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECT
le codebase that doesn't intruce the potential of
breaking it in the future. I may very well have overlooked something.
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Miguel de Icaza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc
Perhaps this could be changed to a static variable in process.c
Wouldn't that make it rather hard to be set from outside process.c? I
need to set it from wine-sharedlib.exe.so
If you can resolve these issues then we can have a single Wine for Win32 and
S.W.F!
Well, you basically saw the hole hi
