On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 04:21:28 Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 21 September 2010 08:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > fortify is only adding security/sanity checks to functions. so if you
> > do: char f[1];
> >strcpy(f, "1234");
> > the C library, w
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 03:34:33 Reece Dunn wrote:
> On 20 September 2010 17:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > well, i dont think this issue is limited to shell32. it's just the only
> > one to hit it atm. what about my other patch i posted ?
> > http://www.winehq.
On Monday, September 20, 2010 06:49:20 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > On Sunday, September 19, 2010 17:17:53 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger writes:
> >> > i dont see how that would help. the code is cu
On Sunday, September 19, 2010 17:17:53 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > i dont see how that would help. the code is currently:
> > typedef struct ... {
> >
> > ...
> > CHAR foo[1];
> >
> > } ...;
> >
> > i
On Sunday, September 19, 2010 08:58:42 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > Newer versions of gcc/glibc with fortify checks enabled will complain
> > about the handling of the network's szNames field. Currently it is
> > always defined with a length
ad should solve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
note: i couldnt find a statement of what C standard wine aims for. if
it is attempting pre-c99, then this will have to be done differently.
perhaps introducing a project-wide define like "VARARRAY" which
ad should solve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
dlls/shell32/pidl.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/shell32/pidl.h b/dlls/shell32/pidl.h
index 3dbfaa6..bbfacef 100644
--- a/dlls/shell32/pidl.h
+++ b/dlls/shell32/pidl.h
@@ -172,12
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 13:24:27 Jacek Caban wrote:
> Now that we have a new Gecko, the work isn't done yet. All packages have
> to be updated. Wine can use only the new version now, so if a package
> contains an older version, it won't work and Gecko installer will be
> used instead. The updat
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 13:24:27 Jacek Caban wrote:
> The problem is that we don't have a way to inform all packagers about
> updates (not all of them follow wine-devel) and it would be nice to have
> a communication channel so future releases won't have such problems.
> Austin suggested announ
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 20:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > dont really know who you're talking about when you say "you guys" ...
> > sounds like you're trying to say this situation is my fault when really i
> > nor Gentoo has ha
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 09:18, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > with udev now, joystick nodes are created as /dev/input/js# and /dev/js#
> > no longer exists ... attached patch will search for /dev/input/js# first
> > and if that doesnt exist, fall bac
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 11:44, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > other major source projects like libsdl had no qualms
> > supporting /dev/input/js as well as /dev/js
>
> Maybe when you guys come up with another new standard next year,
dont really know who
On Sunday 19 February 2006 05:06, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>and adding a way to hide problems that probably don't belong to Wine in
> >> the first place.
> >
> > i dont understand what you mean here at all ...
>
> Perhaps give
On Saturday 18 February 2006 22:27, Mike McCormack wrote:
> It's good for people to build Wine without switching off features so
> that as much of the build as possible is tested on each machine.
so we're clear, it sounds like you wouldnt accept any patch for this
regardless of how it was written
On Sunday 19 February 2006 04:48, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > imo, the guy building the package knows more about the target features
> > than anyone else, and they should have the power to control what is and
> > isnt enabled ... forcing everyone to buil
On Saturday 18 February 2006 08:46, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this patch adds a bunch of --without-FOO options to configure ... some
> > are very simple (like the sane/xml checks) while some others are slightly
> > more involved
>
> What's
On Thursday 16 February 2006 13:18, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the first argument is where the link points to while the second argument
> > is where the link itself is stored
>
> It doesn't point to anything, since w
On Thursday 16 February 2006 11:28, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the previous commit which added DESTDIR support to cvs was not exactly
> > the same patch i posted ... this was both good and bad because on one
> > hand an
18 matches
Mail list logo
