Let me start off with an introduction. I'm a veteran C programmer, but
I'm unfamiliar with programming X11 and unfamiliar with wine, although
I've been looking into both recently to correct a problem I'm having
with wine. I posted about the same problem in August on the same
mailing list, about mak
On 7/26/05, Troy Rollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:25, Felix Nawothnig wrote:
> > There is no need to make anything except the pointers const - I don't
> > think I've ever seen that in real world code. In theory this would give
> > the compiler slightly more information... b
I've been doing some oprofille tests with wine running fce ultra, the
8-bit Nintendo emulator. I found that when running a rom for 60
seconds, more than 99% of the CPU utilization for winex11drv (which
uses the most of all components of wine in this case) is in the same
function : convert_888_to_08
