RE: d3d11 patch

2013-10-13 Thread Max .
Hum... WIR= When it's ready ??? Ok ok, i still wait > From: frederic.dela...@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:49:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: d3d11 patch > To: asnl...@hotmail.com > CC: wine-devel@winehq.org > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Max . wrote: > >

d3d11 patch

2013-10-12 Thread Max .
Hi, I would like to know when the first patchs for d3d11 will be introduce into wine ? Beginning of 2014 ? middle 2014 ? End 2014 ? Thanks,

Re: [PATCH 6/6] d3d9/tests: d3d9ex video memory accounting tests

2013-05-16 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/15/2013 06:32 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: On 14 May 2013 23:46, Stefan Dösinger wrote: These tests have the potential to break on Windows when other applications create or release a large number of video memory resources while the test is running. Yeah, maybe we don't really need this to b

Re: [PATCH] msvcrt: fix character/byte confusion in buffer overflow branch

2013-05-11 Thread Max Kellermann
t;buf is an "APICHAR*" (see printf.h), and adding out->len advances the pointer by "out->len * sizeof(APICHAR)" bytes. Am I missing something? Max

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/freetype.c: A better divide by zero fix, report bad fonts.

2013-05-07 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/07/2013 08:15 AM, Sam Edwards wrote: On 05/06/2013 03:05 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: Just to make this clear, the most recent version of this patch is such a graceful handling, right? I haven't worked on gdi32/freetype.c much, so I wouldn't be the one to say for sure (

[PATCH] msvcrt: fix character/byte confusion in buffer overflow branch

2013-05-07 Thread Max Kellermann
The first memcpy() call in puts_clbk_str_w() confuses character count and byte count. It uses the number of characters (out->len) as number of bytes. This leaves half of the buffer undefined. Interestingly, the second memcpy() call in the same function is correct. This bug potentially makes app

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-06 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/05/2013 06:27 PM, Sam Edwards wrote: So, Wine's font loader seems to be working appropriately and thus the sane thing to do is to make sure tmHeight=0 is handled gracefully. Just to make this clear, the most recent version of this patch is such a graceful handling, right?

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/05/2013 12:09 AM, Sam Edwards wrote: On 05/04/2013 08:27 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: OK. Let's summarize: There are some fonts where tmHeight is in fact 0. If Hin-Tak Leang is correct, these may be Open-Source fonts possibly with proprietary equivalents. Since I have hundre

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
OK. Let's summarize: There are some fonts where tmHeight is in fact 0. If Hin-Tak Leang is correct, these may be Open-Source fonts possibly with proprietary equivalents. Since I have hundreds of fonts installed on my system, it is almost certain that I have one or more. Identifying which wit

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 07:50 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: I'd like to mention two things: - there were(are?) overflows/underflows within Freetype itself, up to and including 2.4.11 - the fixes went into trunk, but AFAIK 2.4.12 isn't release yet. That's specifically affect 32-bit platform, and emulated

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 05:37 PM, Sam Edwards wrote: On 05/04/2013 12:59 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: You are trying to make this about me. It is not. Windows fairly obviously does not do this 'sanity' test. Wine is supposed to imitate windows. To do this absolutely correctly, the who

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 11:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do that, this

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 10:50 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: If you REALLY think the font should not load, you should add code to reject the font with an appropriate diagnostic, not have this code throw a divide by zero exception and abort execution. Until you do that, this

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 01:56 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: +if ( font->aveWidth && font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight ) { +if (((font->aveWidth + font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight - 1) / + font->potm-&g

Re: [PATCH] dlls/gdi32/fretype.c: Avoid division by zero.

2013-05-03 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/04/2013 12:38 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote: +if ( font->aveWidth && font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight ) { +if (((font->aveWidth + font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight - 1) / + font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmHeight) > 100) {

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdi32: Clip font glyphs to fit within text metrics.

2013-04-19 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 04/19/2013 02:46 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: Sam Edwards wrote: This change only affects malformed fonts that have glyphs with splines that go above the maximum ascent as specified in the font's hhea/os2 table. For that reason, any tests for this change would have to include a malformed fon

Re: msvcp60: Avoid signed-unsigned integer comparisons

2013-03-10 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 03/10/2013 07:00 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: On 10 March 2013 08:20, larmbr zhan wrote: But It behaves different when it is signed or not. According to C Standard, >> - For the signed case, once it overflows, resulting in representing a negative value . Actually, sign

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/24/2013 04:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: By the way, do you see something broken or it's just something you want to work on? Partly broken. If fed a bad string, it sometimes blows up and sometimes returns an error code. The 'real' routine also blows up on some strings. Which strings depe

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-23 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/23/2013 02:54 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: Le 21/02/2013 14:33, Max TenEyck Woodbury a écrit : Would it be appropriate to add a test to the name demangler that: 1) Scans all '.dll' and '.spec' files for mangled names, and 2) Tries to decode those names. 3) Prints the

A new demangler test?

2013-02-21 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
Would it be appropriate to add a test to the name demangler that: 1) Scans all '.dll' and '.spac' files for mangled names, and 2) Tries to decode those names. 3) Prints the mangled and decoded names and where they occur. Success would be that all names decode without the decoder blowing up or

Re: RFC: Remove auto-scan of ALSA devices from winealsa.drv

2012-12-12 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 12/11/2012 02:11 PM, Austin English wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: On 12/11/2012 10:46 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: It will also pretty much just remove device selection on setup with multiple audio devices, which is actually fairly common these days with

Re: RFC: Remove auto-scan of ALSA devices from winealsa.drv

2012-12-11 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 12/11/2012 10:46 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: On 11 December 2012 16:05, wrote: Cost to users: Users with a working ALSA device "default" should experience no drawback, only benefits. I believe this is the vast majority of users. Users that edit their ~/.asoundrc to define other devices with

Re: Implementation of PNG 'Get Count' and indexed reads...

2012-11-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/14/2012 10:15 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > >> Would calculating the total number of 'row' calls and reading each row >> as a 'block in turn be an alternate implementation? > > No, your terminology (what is a "ro

Re: Implementation of PNG 'Get Count' and indexed reads...

2012-11-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/14/2012 09:38 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > >>>> These are currently returning 'not implemented'. >>>> >>>> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the >&g

Re: Implementation of PNG 'Get Count' and indexed reads...

2012-11-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/14/2012 07:03 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > >> These are currently returning 'not implemented'. >> >> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the >> indexed read simply r

Implementation of PNG 'Get Count' and indexed reads...

2012-11-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
These are currently returning 'not implemented'. Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the indexed read simply read in the whole thing?

Re: [PATCH] tools/widl/header.c: Add a way to declare interface data members.

2012-11-11 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/11/2012 03:05 PM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: > On 11/11/2012 07:12 AM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >> On 11/11/2012 01:01 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >>> On 11/11/2012 05:00, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >>>> I mentioned this a few days ago. It would have helped if

Re: [PATCH] tools/widl/header.c: Add a way to declare interface data members.

2012-11-10 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/11/2012 01:01 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > On 11/11/2012 05:00, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >> I mentioned this a few days ago. It would have helped if you had >> raised this point then. >> >> As it stands, it is simply a way to adding data members to an agg

Re: [PATCH] tools/widl/header.c: Add a way to declare interface data members.

2012-11-10 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
I mentioned this a few days ago. It would have helped if you had raised this point then. As it stands, it is simply a way to adding data members to an aggregate with an interface. In that sense it is not an addition to the interface since the Vtbl pointer remains exactly as before. The new info

Re: How to tell Mac from Linux wine within a Wine app? (steam hardware survey)

2012-11-10 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 11/10/2012 02:03 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Is there an easy way for the steam hardware survey to tell whether it's > running under Mac or Linux Wine? > > I remember discussing this issue with an engineer from Valve after > asking they make the % of Wine users public again. > > Why do you car

Add data members to interface data structures?

2012-11-09 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
Would a patch that allows data members to be hacked into interface data structures be acceptable? Specifically, this would add sequences that follow this template: #ifdef _IFACE_DATA _IFACE_DATA #endif /* _IFACE_DATA defined */ for each inherited interface, in order.

Re: [PATCH] Remove potential reference count races

2012-10-28 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/28/2012 12:07 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > On 10/28/2012 18:00, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >> On 10/28/2012 03:13 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >>> On 10/28/2012 04:59, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote: >>>> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury >>>> >>>> -

Re: [PATCH] Potential reference count races

2012-10-28 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/28/2012 12:07 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Nikolay Sivov writes: > >> On 10/28/2012 17:44, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >>> Specifying the unnecessary use of a temporary store is a bad habit to >>> have. You should tell the compiler exactly what need

Re: [PATCH] Potential reference count races

2012-10-28 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/28/2012 12:06 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > On 10/28/2012 17:44, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >> On 10/28/2012 02:40 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >>> On 10/28/2012 04:59, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote: >>>> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury >>>> >>>>

Re: windowscodecs questions.

2012-10-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/24/2012 02:18 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote: >> I found some code that reads a generic chunk. I see where the size >> and type are read, where a correctly sized record is allocated and >> where the data is read into the record. > > That code is unused for reading and writing PNG images right

Re: [PATCH 1/5] d3dx9_36: Implement D3DXFileCreate. (try 3)

2012-10-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/24/2012 12:02 PM, Rico Schüller wrote: > On 24.10.2012 16:33, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: >> Christian Costa wrote: >> > +if (!object) > +{ > +ERR("Out of memory\n"); > +return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > +} The ERR() is useless here, just return E_

windowscodecs questions.

2012-10-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
Background: I am trying to improve the performance/reliability of GuildWars2 under wine. In particular, PNG handling seems very slow, so I am looking at windowscodecs and I seem to be misunderstanding some things. I have read the PNG spec. First: The CRC check. The spec says that a 'chunk' c

Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/14/2012 05:33 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: > On 10/14/2012 01:40 AM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: >> Dan: >> >> AJ and DT can both speak for themselves, and have just done so. It >> is now AJs decision. There are criteria beyond the two you mentioned, >> but

Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-13 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/13/2012 06:30 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > In general, patches to wine should have some > demonstrated benefit, either by increasing the > number of passing conformance tests, or by > making some app work better, or both. > > Your current patch doesn't seem to do either of these things. > > Getti

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-13 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/13/2012 09:14 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury writes: > >> Now, if you are going to tell me that these definitions were *copied* >> from a Microsoft *source* rather than derived from a Microsoft >> specification, you would have a point, but the

Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-13 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/12/2012 10:25 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > Hi Max, > here's a little test program that shows that your patch changes how > UIntToPtr works: > > #include > #include > > #define UIntToPtrA(i) ((void *)(intptr_t)((unsigned int)i)) > #define UIntToPtrB(i

Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-13 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/12/2012 09:49 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > >>>> -#define IntToPtr(i) ((void *)(INT_PTR)((INT)i)) >>>> -#define UIntToPtr(ui) ((void *)(UINT_PTR)((UINT)ui)) >>>> -#define LongToPtr(l)(

Re: [PATCH 1/1] include/basetsd.h: fix bad casting

2012-10-12 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/12/2012 01:46 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: > >> -#define IntToPtr(i) ((void *)(INT_PTR)((INT)i)) >> -#define UIntToPtr(ui) ((void *)(UINT_PTR)((UINT)ui)) >> -#define LongToPtr(l)((void *)(LONG_PT

Re: 'PngDecoder_Block_GetCount'

2012-10-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/05/2012 05:53 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote: >> Beyond that, I am not sure what you are talking about. The value to be >> returned (at the address specified by the 2nd parameter) is an unsigned >> integer. There is no place to return 'chunks'; only a place to return a >> count. > > Other method

Re: 'PngDecoder_Block_GetCount'

2012-10-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/05/2012 10:58 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote: > You should take a look at the PNG format spec, particularly the part > about chunks: http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/spec/1.2/PNG-Structure.html > > I believe what's needed here is to return all ancillary chunks. > First, thank you for the pointer to

Re: 'PngDecoder_Block_GetCount'

2012-10-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
Hmm. I definitely misunderstood what this function was intended to do. As I understand things now, there are two ways to approach processing graphical information: 1) As a stream of information to be processed in the order it arrives. 2) As an aggregate to be processed all at once. The PNG forma

Re: [patch 1/1] dlls/windowscodecs/pngformat.c: implemented 'PngDecoder_Block_GetCount'

2012-10-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 10/05/2012 03:55 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > On 10/5/2012 06:43, max+...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote: >> From: Max TenEyck Woodbury >> >> --- >> dlls/windowscodecs/pngformat.c |6 -- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >>

Re: http://winetricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/install-gecko.sh also installs mono

2012-06-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/05/2012 01:16 PM, James Eder wrote: You obviously have absolutely no idea what the wine-mono package is for. You should read up and apologize. NO APOLOGY! You are missing the point. You are missing the point. You're argument lacks weight because you clearly have no idea what you're

Re: http://winetricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/install-gecko.sh also installs mono

2012-06-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/05/2012 03:00 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: [...] A native MSWindows application that wants .net support would either connect to the installed dll that provides the required services or install such a dll. It would know nothing about '

Re: http://winetricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/install-gecko.sh also installs mono

2012-06-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/05/2012 01:50 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: --- On Mon, 4/6/12, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: On 06/04/2012 03:05 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Dan

Re: http://winetricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/install-gecko.sh also installs mono

2012-06-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/04/2012 03:05 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: http://winetricks.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/install-gecko.sh now also installs mono.

Re: Wine in Humble Indie Bundle

2012-06-03 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/03/2012 02:03 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: I see the Humble Indie Bundle includes a game ported via wine, http://zcint.co.uk/article/limbo-on-linux-incites-humble-bundle-petition That's pretty cool, but not everyone agrees, and somebody has started circulating an anti-wine petition. So I put toge

Re: Mono?!?

2012-06-02 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 12:34 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote: Yes, that was added in today's Git. When you do a prefix update, and a recent wine-mono (or native .NET) isn't installed, Wine will try to install it from a system location, and if that fails it will ask to download it. The wine-mono install is limite

Re: Mono?!?

2012-06-01 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 09:58 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Max TenEyck Woodbury > mailto:m...@mtew.isa-geek.net>> wrote: > > On 06/01/2012 12:40 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > > > You realize that Microsoft has a legally binding irrevo

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 12:51 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote: If it IS optional, then there should be a clear way to REMOVE it, and while I have not looked at the situation long enough to find out how to remove it, I did not see something as obvious as an 'uninstall-mono' script. If you run "wine uninstaller"

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 12:40 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > You realize that Microsoft has a legally binding irrevocable agreement > to not assert patents on .NET implementations that comply with the > standard, right? Mono falls under that. I wouldn't worry about patents > when it comes to Mono. We'

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/31/2012 11:05 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury > mailto:m...@mtew.isa-geek.net>> wrote: > > When did WINE start requiring MONO? > > I have a VERY strong DISLIKE for MONO and do NOT want it on my machin

Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
When did WINE start requiring MONO? I have a VERY strong DISLIKE for MONO and do NOT want it on my machines. Seems to be a recent addition. Is it possible to NOT use it? PLEASE!

Using an IDE on Wine?

2012-05-12 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
How many of you use an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) when working on Wine? If you do, which one do you use and how, how useful is it and how hard was it to set up? Max

Re: w9x testbot state?

2011-08-08 Thread max
nt, but supporting older applications is also useful. Max

Re: GSoC-2011: Implement Missing Mesh Functions in Wine?s D3DX9

2011-08-04 Thread max
On 08/04/2011 12:36 PM, David Laight wrote: On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:30:41AM -0400, max wrote: On 08/03/2011 09:28 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: Well yes, it's implementation defined, not undefined. The point is that there isn't necessarily any relation to endianness. Just use shifts

Re: GSoC-2011: Implement Missing Mesh Functions in Wine’s D3DX9

2011-08-04 Thread max
x27;int' has 32 bits, the total size of all the fields in the group must be 32 bits. THIS HAS PROBABLY BEEN DONE ALREADY!, you just have to dig it out of the list of available configure tests. max (I'm in the middle of something else, otherwise, I'd dig it out myself...)

Re: GSoC-2011: Implement Missing Mesh Functions in Wine’s D3DX9

2011-08-03 Thread max
em but different compilers may define them differently. Because different compilers DO define them differently, they are not portable. Since they are not portable, wine should not use them without cloaking them in macros that compensate for the differences. Which is a PITA. Has anybody done the cloaks already? Max

Re: [docs] winedev: Update code columns limit (resend)

2011-07-25 Thread max
tions. Wider and conflicts arise with the less expensive kinds of equipment. I've lived with the 80 column for more then 3 decades. It chafes a little at times, but ANY standard will irritate. Max 01122334455667

Re: use Lithuanian letter in my name

2011-07-19 Thread max
At least in the case of c2man, the git logs are not consulted. Max

Re: Glitch-free iTunes?

2011-07-04 Thread max
On 07/04/2011 02:15 PM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 04.07.2011 20:08, schrieb max: 1. Does it run on Windows? iTunes is an Apple product and it could be that it has been intentionally implemented so that it does not run on Microsoft's OS. Why then providing a Windowsversion??? :) S

Re: Glitch-free iTunes?

2011-07-04 Thread max
On 07/02/2011 03:46 PM, Keith Curtis wrote: Hi; Here is a rant about iTunes: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/229398-2/day_3_dude_wheres_my_itunes.html You guys are doing great, but I think it would be better if you were to work more in priority order. There are 200M devices, last

Re: Trailing white space and other pedantry.

2011-05-16 Thread max
On 05/16/2011 09:39 PM, Ken Thomases wrote: On May 16, 2011, at 7:42 PM, max wrote: On 05/16/2011 01:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote: I understand that white space only patches will not be applied. Will they be applied if they accompany other corrections? If one would otherwise have modified a

Re: Trailing white space and other pedantry.

2011-05-16 Thread max
On 05/16/2011 01:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 16.05.2011 18:34, schrieb m...@mtew.isa-geek.net: From: Max TenEyck Woodbury I have been working on the documentation extraction problem and code analysis problem. I have made some progress with the program I am writing to do this. It reads

Trailing white space and other pedantry.

2011-05-16 Thread max
From: Max TenEyck Woodbury I have been working on the documentation extraction problem and code analysis problem. I have made some progress with the program I am writing to do this. It reads the same files as c2man.pl does, but does a more detailed parse of the code. In fact, it even reads

Re: [PATCH] Label verbosity levels.

2011-03-19 Thread max
From: max On 03/19/2011 08:42 PM, Joris Huizer wrote: > On 03/19/2011 11:32 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> On 03/18/2011 09:24 PM, m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote: >>> - if ($opt_verbose> 0) >>> - { >>> -print "Processing ".$spec_name."\

Re: [PATCH] NTDLL atom.c documentation.

2011-03-07 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
tly to do with 'integral' atoms. The notes I've added bring out this issue somewhat more strongly than the code does. That should provide a clue to why some of the minor twists in the code are there. Maybe I'll see your point in the morning... Max

Re: [PATCH] NTDLL atom.c documentation.

2011-03-06 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 03/06/2011 10:34 AM, Juan Lang wrote: Hi Max, + * http://www.geoffchappell.com/studies/windows/win32/ntdll/history/names40.htm Please don't link to his site. As I said in an unrelated message to wine-patches last week, he used disassembly when performing his analysis:

Re: Please help me with document extraction.

2011-03-03 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
ff is done. Oh, and the total amount is indeed huge, but each piece is not. It's just that there are _lots_ of pieces. The way to eat an elephant is one bite at a time... Max

Re: Please help me with document extraction.

2011-03-01 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/28/2011 11:34 AM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 28.02.2011 17:20, schrieb Max TenEyck Woodbury: I think the idea of building upon the existing "documentation" somewhere else has a better chance than the "deal on the 100" Frankly, I believe embedded documentation is

Re: Please help me with document extraction.

2011-02-28 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/28/2011 08:08 AM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 27.02.2011 20:37, schrieb Max TenEyck Woodbury: I've picked up Perl in the last couple weeks. An interesting language with lots of adopted features. It's been easy to learn, so I think I will _not_ need help with the language itself,

Re: Please help me with document extraction.

2011-02-27 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/27/2011 05:55 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: ... If you want to prove me wrong, start writing it. Once you have properly documented 100 functions, we can discuss what extra infrastructure is needed for the remaining 50,000. Deal on the 100! Max

Re: Please help me with document extraction.

2011-02-27 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/27/2011 02:49 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Max TenEyck Woodbury writes: P.S. to AJ et al. There is a _lot_ of documentation embedded in the wine code, but it is hard to find at the moment. I'd like to see it indexed and this is the program that does the extraction and indexing. A

Please help me with document extraction.

2011-02-27 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
this is the program that does the extraction and indexing. Advice on making this new version available and active are in order. Max

Re: kernel32/tests: remove win9x hacks

2011-02-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
g while I was away collecting my thoughts? James McKenzie That was my understanding as well. Max

Re: Resend: Who does c2man?

2011-02-11 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/11/2011 12:20 PM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: On 02/11/2011 05:19 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: I have just been going over tools/c2man and have a fair number of questions about it. You can ask them here. This is why wine-devel exists. There is also IRC (http://wiki.winehq.org/IRC) But

Resend: Who does c2man?

2011-02-11 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
information, or indicate that you want this done on some forum. Max

Patch 21026 superseded by patch 71118.

2011-02-09 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
No text.

Re: Killing WineAPI project on SourceForge.

2011-02-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
quot; but where is the script ? Max, if you want, you can still improve the script and make it more useful. For instance, instead of "Statistics" which give simple numbers, I think a link to each function in the wine source code should be great. I have some ideas like adding a "searc

Re: Killing WineAPI project on SourceForge.

2011-02-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/05/2011 08:59 AM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 05.02.2011 06:36, schrieb Max TenEyck Woodbury: No feedback and apparently no interest in the WineAPI project on SourceForge. Understandable since there is now a WineAPI on the regular Wine Wiki. Unless someone objects, I'm going to ask

Wine API documentation questions.

2011-02-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
ed in each API description rather than trying to get 'c2man' to generate it. - The name of the file containing the implementation is included in each 'implementation' section and includes a link to the appropriate repository source entry. The name of the appropriate header is also included, but does not include a link. A link should be included. Max

Killing WineAPI project on SourceForge.

2011-02-04 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
No feedback and apparently no interest in the WineAPI project on SourceForge. Understandable since there is now a WineAPI on the regular Wine Wiki. Unless someone objects, I'm going to ask that it be shutdown on SourceForge. Max

FYI: OpenCL/opencl.h from NVIDIA...

2011-01-20 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
e requirement for it into 'configure'. Max

Where can I get OpenCL for Fedora 14.

2011-01-20 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
penCL implementation for Fedora 14? Max

Help with 'WineAPI' wiki

2010-11-12 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
once. Someone to review what I am doing might help. - Max

WineAPI wiki progress

2010-10-28 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
implementation. There is ONE API description page at this point. If any of you would care to look at it and send me comments, I will read them. I will be setting up analytic scripts for the individual API pages after the name space indexes are in place. Max

WineAPI wiki status update

2010-09-25 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
s. Header and code analysis are on queue after that, as is improving the page format. There are a bunch of old pages without the 'Wine/' prefix. They are being removed. Advice on wiki-bots would be helpful. - Max

Re: WineAPI wiki progress (resent)

2010-09-15 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 09/15/2010 10:47 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: Actually, that was a mistake on my part. If you use: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php you can skip the login. ARGH! Make that: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php - Max

Re: WineAPI wiki progress (resent)

2010-09-15 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: The previous version ended up as a reply to something inappropriate. The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository

Re: WineAPI wiki progress (resent)

2010-09-15 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 09/15/2010 10:25 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: On 09/15/2010 03:32 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content. Well, to be frank, I

WineAPI wiki progress (resent)

2010-09-15 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
content is useful and how it could be improved. None of the analysis of the file content is in place. I plan to start with analysis of the '.spec' files. That should make some of the information on the API available. - Max

WineAPI wiki progress.

2010-09-14 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
of the file content is in place. I plan to start with analysis of the '.spec' files. That should make some of the information on the API available. - Max

WineAPI structure plans

2010-08-16 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
for sub-pages and will be set up in the generated initial versions of those pages. That structure consists of a link back to the article that included the sub-page, markings that the page is editable and at least one section header to serve as a handle to enable easy editing of the sub-page. -Max

Re: The WineAPI wiki.

2010-08-06 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 08/06/2010 05:44 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: [...] Here's roughly what I have in mind: 1. Win32 API 1. Overview 2. acledit API 1. Overview 2. Functions 1. Func1 2.

Re: The WineAPI wiki.

2010-08-05 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 08/05/2010 03:56 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: [...] There several things that have to be coordinated however: - This is not just the API documentation. It includes a great deal of information about the meta-structure of the Wine project. Easy

  1   2   >