Re: comtctl32 : updown : Getter and Setter Tests for Updown control

2007-02-12 Thread Leslie Choong
;sohuld'. You should use the same filename as before, but increment the number in the filename. You might consider using the expect() macro I've been encouraging the other cs130 students to use, it makes the repeated ok() calls a bit more readable (IMHO, we'll see if others agre

Re: comtctl32 : updown : Getter and Setter Tests for Updown control

2007-02-12 Thread Leslie Choong
Hey there, I've made the changes so that the return value is not stored unnecessarily. I've also added comments explaining why. Let me know what you think. -Leslie On 2/11/07, Leslie Choong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the input. UDM_SETRANGE has no return value acco

Re: comtctl32 : updown : Getter and Setter Tests for Updown control

2007-02-11 Thread Leslie Choong
Thanks for the input. UDM_SETRANGE has no return value according to MSDN so I'll remove those assignments. On 2/11/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/10/07, Leslie Choong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, My name is Leslie Choong and I am currently fin