iliyt, complexity of managing a USB
implementation for wine ? I am rather good at linux device drivers and such.
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
There is another category of users who doesn't like message boxes, perhaps an
option
between them which defaults to message boxes ?
/ Lars Segerlund.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:58:15 +
Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:54:15 -0600, Robert Shearma
Hi,
Has anybody given prospect & oprofile a spin ?
My machine is a bit to slow for a build of the latest wine, but I figured it
could be a nice way to check systemusage in conjunction with wine.
Opinions ?
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:25 +0200 (EET)
Sau
worth giving a shot ?
Regards, Lars Segerlund.
I just had a thought, wouldn't perhaps DCOM support for wine with a minimum
implementation do ? That way not everything had to be done at once ?
This could reduce time to deployment, and perhaps make it possible not to drop Linux
in favour of XP ..
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
On Th
eeded.
Any comments ?
I just wanted to know if I was thinking in the right tracks and if anybody has an
estimate about how hard an undertaking like this would be before getting into the
effort.
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
I don't know if you have seen this before, but it's a program to run the grafix
pipeline interactive, thought it might be usefull.
http://mirror.ati.com/developer/sdk/rage128SDK/Multex/Multex3D.html
/ have a look, Lars Segerlund.
thing I have configured wrongly ? (
I have tried it on two different machines with different settings and hardware + soft
OpenGL and hardware OpenGL ).
Still it beats me ..
any help appreciated if only 'no this should not work' ..
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
