Yes, it works differently from git-imap-send, it takes separate files as input.
2011/2/13 GOUJON Alexandre :
> On 02/13/2011 12:10 PM, Krzysztof Nikiel wrote:
>>
>> It's a kind of side effect of my Wine patching.
>> Sending those patches traditional way was an epic fa
This attachment may be better:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# SSL IMAP message appender
# Copyright (C) 2011 Krzysztof Nikiel
use Socket;
use Net::SSLeay qw(die_now die_if_ssl_error);
Net::SSLeay::load_error_strings();
Net::SSLeay::SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms();
Net::SSLeay::randomize();
$g_port=993;
$g_tag
ule.
Maybe it will be useful to someone.
#!/usr/bin/perl
# SSL IMAP message appender
# Copyright (C) 2011 Krzysztof Nikiel
use Socket;
use Net::SSLeay qw(die_now die_if_ssl_error);
Net::SSLeay::load_error_strings();
Net::SSLeay::SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms();
Net::SSLeay::randomize();
$g_port=993
2011/2/11 :
> Hi,
>
> The question how to split is interesting. I haven't found the answer
> about how to split my future MIDI player rewrite either. Like yours,
> it will replace old functions with something new.
It looks like introducing bigger patches is a kind of mission impossible.
>
> So
2011/2/11 Maarten Lankhorst :
>> Well, previous version of this patch was rejected as "needs
>> splitting", it's basically too big to be send as a single patch. It
>> can be applied as several smaller chunks or rejected as a whole. I
>> don't think there is any other option.
>
> Thanks for looking
2011/2/11 Vitaliy Margolen :
> On 02/11/2011 04:34 AM, Krzysztof Nikiel wrote:
>>
>> +typedef double sample_t;
>>
>> +static inline sample_t getsample(LPBYTE buf, INT bps)
>> +{
>> + tmp = ((sample_t) (*((BYTE *) buf)) - 128.0);
>
> No need to t
Sure, I'm working on it.
2011/2/11 Vitaliy Margolen :
> On 02/11/2011 02:38 AM, Krzysztof Nikiel wrote:
>>
>> I have changed this when creating the new resampler patch but it's not
>> really related to the main patchset.
>
> The patch is wrapped. Please send
2011/2/11 Ricardo Filipe :
>
>
> 2011/2/11 Krzysztof Nikiel
>>
>> 2011/2/11 Dmitry Timoshkov :
>> > Krzysztof Nikiel wrote:
>> >
>> >> > You can't send Makefile changes separately from added/removed
>> >> > files, a patc
2011/2/11 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Krzysztof Nikiel wrote:
>
>> > You can't send Makefile changes separately from added/removed
>> > files, a patch should not add dead code.
>>
>> Could you explain "dead code", all 13 parts need to be applied,
&g
