On 2005-09-14, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 2005-09-10, JustFillBug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I saw the bug described in:
>>>http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
>>>happened again to a program I was trying to
On 2005-09-14, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does this patch fix it?
>
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.189
> diff -u -p -r1.189 socket.c
> --- dlls/winsock/socket.c 27 Aug 2005 09:20:24 - 1.189
> +++ dlls/winsock/socket.c
On 2005-09-10, JustFillBug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I saw the bug described in:
> http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
> happened again to a program I was trying to use. At least the behavior
> is the same. I have no access to the source code. It se
I saw the bug described in:
http://winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/2001/01/0516.html
happened again to a program I was trying to use. At least the behavior
is the same. I have no access to the source code. It seems the problem
was fixed in revision 1.42 of socket.c. But now at 1.139, WSACleanup
a
