On 05 Sep 2013, at 16:58, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> So either
>> * you add code in between that resets the state so that test2 can be run
>> independently of whether test1 failed (as Wolfgang proposes), or
>> * you put the tests in compl
On 05 Sep 2013, at 16:32, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> The tests must pass under Wine without any additional "fixes" as they do
> currently under Windows. If you add some code to the tests which suddenly
> makes them pass under Wine - that's not a fix, Wine implementation should
> be fixed instead.
On 24 Jun 2013, at 04:30, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
<0001-ws2_32-Fix-interface-bound-filter-to-accept-locally-.patch>
The added "struct sock_filter ip_memaddr" field doesn't seem to be used.
Jonas
On 17 May 2013, at 13:40, Alessandro Pignotti wrote:
> Wine does not seem to even try to load DLLs at their preferred address.
> Still,
> I'm not sure this is actually bad and I think Win8 forces randomization of
> the
> layout anyway,
Afaik an application can tell the OS that it should not
On 16 May 2013, at 19:03, Alessandro Pignotti wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 16:47, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Addendum: he just realised that you may be talking about multiple
base
relocation arrays for a single page (arrays that contain the offsets
of the instructions that need fixing up), which would
On 16 May 2013, at 16:34, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 15 May 2013, at 16:31, Alessandro Pignotti wrote:
Packaged with a game, I found a peculiar DLL which has duplicate
blocks in the
relocation table. I mean that the same pages are relocated twice
and this of
course breaks the DLL. I'm not
On 15 May 2013, at 16:31, Alessandro Pignotti wrote:
Packaged with a game, I found a peculiar DLL which has duplicate
blocks in the
relocation table. I mean that the same pages are relocated twice and
this of
course breaks the DLL. I'm not sure about what could be a right way
to support
su
On 06 Jun 2012, at 09:06, Eric Pouech wrote:
> that's a limitation of dwarf format (IIRC, from the specs, you have
> either the default CC for your programming language/ABI, or a specific
> one without defining it further)
Yes and no:
* the DWARF standard itself does not specify any calling conv
Dan Kegel wrote on Wed, 04 Jul 2012:
(https://code.google.com/p/winezeug/source/browse/trunk/buildbot/dotests_blacklist.txt
has a list of all the tests that the buildbot failed on while it was
running
The ones annotated with http://xquartz.macosforge.org/trac/ticket/512
should work with the
