Ricardo Filipe gmail.com> writes:
> as i said before, it was an uninformed decision, and yes, not enough time was
>left for feedback from the maintainers.we thought that appdb WOULD save all the
>data when moving, not only tests. it serves as example for us for the future,
>unfortunatly with prob
Ben Klein gmail.com> writes:
>
> I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
> "Everquest", is listed as version 2 under "Everquest" in AppDB. This
> is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,
> it is a new game. Can someone help me fix it? I'd del
This is really nitpicking isn't it?
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 12:02 +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> I just noticed that the entry for "Everquest II", the sequel to
> "Everquest", is listed as version 2 under "Everquest" in AppDB. This
> is incorrect, as the sequel is not a new version of the original game,