-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool! Nice job.
On 06/06/13 20:15, Austin English wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Joel Holdsworth
> wrote: For some reason, since I send in
> my icon for joy.cpl, it doesn't appear in the control panel - still
> on
his myself, but if someone has time, I think it would be worth
resolving before the release.
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRsFMgAAoJEIsWlG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/05/13 12:56, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Christian Costa wrote:
>
>> and no modern gcc/other compiler that I can find cares.
> It was probably added because of a tool that warned of the
> unused parameter ... So it all goes in circles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/05/13 13:04, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> In my effort to improve wineconsole and its calculations of the
> largest possible window size, three scenarios come into play.
>
> 1. wineconsole with --backend=user (or more simply, 'wineconsole
> app.exe, i
sn't have a
256px icon though. Is this wanted?
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRW/TtAAoJEIsWlGmq62IgaEcIAJYY9q/B3fA2AZQnR5M41qWn
Hi Jacek, thanks for that information. That really helpful. I might be able to
find my way through to the solution.
Joel
On 27 July 2012 at 13:58 Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On 07/26/12 20:32, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've recently be
l 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joel Holdsworth
> wrote:
> >
> > On 26 July 2012 at 23:40 Dan Kegel wrote:
> >
> >> I'm running into a similar problem,
> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23058
> >> If you're using a different activex contr
On 26 July 2012 at 23:40 Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm running into a similar problem,
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23058
> If you're using a different activex control,
> please file a new bug, with a way
> for others to reproduce the problem.
Yes that does sound quite similar. I predict o
Hi All,
I've recently begun working at VCA technology on an IP security camera
system. I'm mostly doing embedded linux stuff, but bhe code I'm working
with uses an ActiveX control to show the video and the overlaid annotations.
I've doing quite a lot of experimentation trying to get the page
Hi All,
I've just submitted an icon for joy.cpl to wine-patches.
Unfortunatly I've uncovered a problem with the buildimage script. When I
first wrote the script, I used the "rsvg" command to convert svg to png.
rsvg has been depreciated in favour of rsvg-convert, which has slightly
different
Yes I agree, that FIXME looks strange. As you say, folder_icon.ico has all
three icon sizes inside, so why is included in the resource three times?
Does native have 3 icon resources? Is it ok to use the same multi-size icon
3 times?
Joel
On 20 April 2012 at 06:53 Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> I
Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every build snapshot, and
placing that on a server somewhere?
e.g. a folder full of36def4af0ca85a1d0e66b5207056775bcb3b09ff.tar.gz files?
Then one could write a simple wine regression bisect tool that implements
similar semantics to git bise
Hmm,
Looks like it was caused by commit
9c4432f69d91007d02c52c50ba565ca795f44765, I think the CLSID isn't being
included properly. Probably easy to fix.
Joel
+1
I have the same issue in Ubuntu 10.10
Joel
"nmap source.winehq.org" shows no git port. Any ideas?
Hi All,
I just wanted to highlight my new project - WineSkin
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wineskin/
WineSkin is an attempt to create a set of scripts that auto-generate the
necessary themes, visual styles and registry keys to visually integrate
wine with the host desktop environment. At the mo
> > Does it fix a bug? If not, AJ may have placed it aside until after Wine 1.2
> > is released.
>
> Indeed. Adding new strings to translate will/should probably have to
> wait until after Wine 1.2, so we can get as many languages as possible
> at 100% when 1.2 is released.
>
> OTOH, if it new s
> It says apply failure for 3/3, so that's probably why 2/3 wasn't committed
> also.
>
> Problem is that there are a lot of translation updates these days and
> some patches affect winecfg .rc files. I guess you should rebase on
> git head and resend patch. However, I see there is still one patch
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:56 +0100, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth
> ---
> programs/winecfg/Bg.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/Cs.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/Da.rc| 19 +
> programs/winecfg/D
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 22:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth writes:
>
> > Are you sure? I really do think using PNGs is preferable. The PNG is
> > 22.8kB, whereas a BMP would be 237.2kB - over 10x larger! If I use a
> > BMP, it will make the winecf
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 20:05 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth writes:
>
> > Are PNG icons supported? It didn't look like they were when I checked.
> > Also, sizes larger than 255px, are only partially supported in the
> > format. So any app, includi
Are PNG icons supported? It didn't look like they were when I checked.
Also, sizes larger than 255px, are only partially supported in the
format. So any app, including wine would have legitimate reasons to
reject such a file.
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:38 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
&
0x329128, 256, L"\"%1\",,-1,0",
L"http://www.winehq.org";, (nil), 0x32c004
trace:exec:SHELL_ArgifyW used 33 of 256 space
trace:exec:dde_connect L"\"%1\",,-1,0" L"http://www.winehq.org"; =>
L"\"http://www.winehq.org
Hi All,
I know it's late and we're in freeze mode now, but I wanted to offer
some work I've been doing:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/space/new-about-screen.png
Basically I've been giving the about page of winecfg a face lift. It
seemed like a good idea to put some polish on it in time for the
> Hi Joel,
>
> I think this has been mentioned before, but the monitor icons (32-bit
> and 8-bit for size 32) show a wider lower half of the monitor compared
> to the upper half (I think the 32-bit size 22 as well).
>
I've heard feedback about the screen colour before, which I've resolved. Nev
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:50 +0200, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
> Hi, this will be just a short note... I noticed some new icons and i
> like them!
>
> W.
>
There's plenty more to come: http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/ !
Hi,
Are there any thoughts about my latest round of icon patches?
Thanks
Joel
Ok, I have good news and bad news.
The good news is that multipage is standard now in SVG 1.2, and it is possible
to embed a raster image in the SVG if you encode it in base64. Embedded images
are partially supported in inkscape via python extensions.
The bad news is that you can't set the canvas
> I'm certainly open to suggestions on how to reduce the work needed for
> the first step, but it needs to be a step in the right direction. Adding
> 500 files and reorganizing many directories is not a good intermediate
> measure. I definitely want your work committed too, in fact I included
> it
On 22 March 2010 at 15:37 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth writes:
>
> >> I still think that having to commit 10 source files per icon is not
> >> acceptable, even with subdirectories.
> > I agree it is a lot of source files, but I don'
> I still think that having to commit 10 source files per icon is not
> acceptable, even with subdirectories.
I agree it is a lot of source files, but I don't see that that's a problem if
they're stored neatly within a resources subdirectory. user32.dll has a lot of
images, but that's not a prob
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth writes:
>
> > @@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ filter: dummy
> > .man.in.man:
> > LC_ALL=C sed -e 's,@bindir\@,$(bindir),g' -e
> >'s,@dlldir\@,$(dlldir),g' -e 's,@PACKAGE_STRING\@,@PACKAGE_STRING
ne - GPLd, but have e-mail agreeing a
relicense.
* Joel Holdsworth - my original work - LGPLd.
What would be the best way for us to attribute these? I guess we need to
do things properly with regard to licensing, but I think the authors are
all quite easy-going.
Any thoughts
Thanks
Joel
Hi All,
I've spoken to the authors of the two icons that needed their licenses
resolving. They've agreed to relicense them, so the Tango icons are
ready to go. I've sent a pull request to wine-patches.
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:20 +0100, Warren Dumortier wrote:
> Thanks for all your work (is there some screenshot)?
> There's no doubt that the Tango icons are good, but would it be
> possible to easily make icon themes maybe, to have Oxygen icons for
> example? If i understand it's hardcoded, like o
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 11:34 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth writes:
>
> > My final question is about what to do with my source artwork. The
> > artwork has been collected from a variety of sources. Some is SVGs, some
> > gimp .xcf.bz2s, and some p
Hi All,
I'm pleased to announce that after a lot of work lately I've pretty much
completed the graphics for the icons for shell32, user32 and the
programs all sizes and screen depths:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/
There are a few minor things left to do:
* comctl32: Finish and
ve any thoughts.
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
I'm just wondering how easy would it be to do something simple with a
proper dialog template. The reason I ask is that I've been working on an
icon for dxdiag (http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/), and it'd be
nice if there was a dialog ready to receive it. It's no big deal though.
What do yo
> > It works for precreated manifest as a separate file (not compiled in),
> > isn't it? If so you could do a trick that
> > I spotted here
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078869.html
> > for a first time -
> > here another process is created after main test binary l
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 02:40 +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in
> > comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present
> > in co
> Do you mean that the tests pass on Windows but not Wine when using
> load_v6_module, or that they don't pass on either platform? I used
> load_v6_module for some v6 imagelist tests (which may not yet be merged
> into Wine actually; I should probably check that and resubmit) and they
> worked
Hi All,
I'm working on some tests to demonstrate some alpha-channel behaviour in
comctl32 ImageLists. The problem is that this behaviour is only present
in comctl32 v6, which of course you usually activate with an xml
manifest. For the wine test suite we have a helper function,
load_v6_module, tha
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 16:02 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> As of XP themes can specify their own icons. For some dlls I believe
> shell32 they need to provide their own shellapi.dll or whatever it is
> called. I think that would be the way to proceed. I would suggest to
> make Tango the base
Hi All,
Thanks to those of you who made comments about my Tango icon set. I've
thought carefully about all the comments I've received, and I'm most of
the way through the issues raised. I've revised idb_std_large.bmp,
idb_std_small.bmp, floppy.ico, mycomputer.ico, netdrive.ico,
netdrive2.ico, shor
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 13:52 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> idb_std_large.bmp & idb_std_small.bmp - The third to last and the
> sixth to last icons do not make sense. I don't understand why they
> were designed the way they were. The icons imply something different
> from the original icons. Please c
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 21:43 +0200, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2009/9/19 Vitaliy Margolen :
> > - The European stop sign is not known/used in US. It has no meaning to most
> > people.
> Actually, assuming you mean
> http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/oic_hand-48.png, that's not a
> stop sign in Eu
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 19:02 +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> This looks really great. But what for a first look wine glass
> position
> and size isn't consistent for 48x48 icons -
> is there any reason for that?
As I was drawing the icons, it didn't seem appropriate to draw the glass
in the same way
oduced.
The work is most clear to see if you open a file dialog, or a message
box.
The full set of Tango graphics can be seen here:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/ . There are still a few
graphical things to fix: dxdiag, certwatermark.bmp.
Comments and criticisms are welcome!
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
Great thanks!
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 00:42 +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Does anyone know what DLL the image 32-bit version the standard image
> > list IDB_VIEW_SMALL_COLOR is stored in in Windows? You can see some of
> >
Hi All,
Does anyone know what DLL the image 32-bit version the standard image
list IDB_VIEW_SMALL_COLOR is stored in in Windows? You can see some of
it in this screenshot:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/IDB_VIEW_SMALL_COLOR.png. I might expect
it to be in comctl32.dll with the other common image l
If you want, I can draw a Tango-style icon for it, as part of my work in
progress wine icon refresh: http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 17:30 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
> I am curious though, the cryptui.dll cert icons don't strike me as
> right. I can't even tell what they are supposed to be.
The icon is the standard "certification" icon taken from the Tango base
set. From what I can see it represents a wa
Quick question: Does anyone have an SVG of the wine logo as used on the
wine website? I'd like to use it as part of my graphics refresh to
improve idb_wine.bmp as shown here:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/wine-icon/
Hi All,
Some of you may have read some of my recent mails about my work to
refresh the wine icons with Tango versions, as demonstrated in this
screenshot: http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/alpha-tango-icons.png
Achieving this task isn't a simple icon replacement job, because of the
inability of wine
> I don't think you need such a complex test, we don't really care about
> the exact reason why it's broken.
Agreed. Fielding all the different deviations is getting quite
convoluted. The modern/legacy stuff will need to remain because in some
of these tests windows has made step changes - e.g. a
> cursoricon.c:1039: Test failed: Overlaying Mask 0 on Color 00A0B0C0 with
> DrawIcon. Expected 3163 (modern), or 3868 (legacy). Got 20B8 from
> line 1109
> cursoricon.c:1039: Test failed: Overlaying Mask 1 on Color 00A0B0C0 with
> DrawIcon. Expected 00FFCE9C (modern), or 00FFD0A0 (
> GetVersion() is not a problem in itself but we make an effort to decide
> what to test based on behavior not version. If it absolutely can not be
> avoided (and you will see some examples in the code) GetVersion() is
> accepted.
I think this is the case here. DrawIcon[Ex]'s behaviour has evo
> I've run your new tests on Win95, Win98 and NT4 (all VMware):
> Is there another way you can detect whether some XP (and up) tests can
> be run? We generally try not to use GetVersion() in our tests.
>
It turns out that the reason for the Win95 errors is that it calculates
true-colour -> 16-b
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 08:43 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Hi Joel,
>
> I've run your new tests on Win95, Win98 and NT4 (all VMware):
>
other test
platforms would be welcome, and any comments on the other 4 patches
before I submit them.
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
>From d22ba983b85028f667a7754858f35c7e219847e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Holdsworth
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 21:13:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added tests for
> Looks great, hope you get your code clean and soon can send patches.
> Why the buttons on the right top of the open-dialog are empty?
Answer: Hack n' slash. I have no reproduction of the mechanism for
checking which images *should* be alpha blended, and which should not -
the code assumes all ic
Hi All,
I've been working away little by little at my icons work, and I'm
beginning to make a little progress:
http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/alpha-tango-icons.png
The screenshot montage shows my work on getting HICONs and HIMAGELISTs
to support the alpha channel, combined with a refreshed icon s
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 22:18 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> Haven't checked Jaunty yet to see if it's still busted.
> We may need to postprocess pkg-config's output to add the
> missing 32
> in some cases. Not sure if it's worth it.
>
On Jaunty I get
$ pkg-config
Is there a reason why my patch (attached) hasn't been included yet? This
is my first patch, so maybe someone can help me get it in.
Joel
>From e8398597bfe4772e065ebd98aa3f93a9f681a2fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Holdsworth
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:13:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 16:05 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> We do support some alpha support using XRender, can't you use this
> too? I think that's the general method for using alpha at the moment
> on X.
Yes and I'm using GdiAlphaBlend - for rendering, and I have fixes to use
it. It's what
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Joel Holdsworth
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:38 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth
> >> wrote:
> >
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:38 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working
> > fine for icon creation, but ExtractIcon an
Hi All,
I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working
fine for icon creation, but ExtractIcon and LoadIconFromResource etc.
are all proving more of a problem. All of these use various GDI DIB
functions to coerce the icon bitmap to the correct colour depth and
size. The p
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 08:58 -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> > How do you deal with this problem, because presumably not every test
> > contributor has VMs ready to confirm the behaviour of 95, 98, ME, 2000,
> > XP and Vista. Do I submit the patch as-is, in the knowlege that it will
> > caus
on Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Holdsworth
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:13:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added tests for DrawIcon and DrawIconEx
---
dlls/user32/tests/cursoricon.c | 209
1 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/us
n for 48x48, which means that when the icon is drawn at size
22x22 in my gnome menu, there will be line width of 0.46px which looks
too faint next to the other icons which have been tuned for small sizes,
and have 1px lines.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Thanks
Joel Holdsworth
> From: http://www.telegraphics.com.au/svn/icoformat/trunk/dist/README.html
> "The ICO format has an inherent 1 bit transparency mask (0 =
> opaque, 1 = transparent), called the AND bitmap."
> which is the older format icon. and:
> "In PNG (Vista) format icons, the alpha channel is simply s
> Making the icon(s) configurable would be a bonus.
Yes I'm not this will be possible in the first instance, because icons
have to be compiled into the DLL resources at compile time. In the long
run, it might be possible for some of our dialogs to use theme icons
instead, but we'll still need a no
> We do support transparency. Fancy alpha blending effects might not
> work but this should work I think. It might depend on the file type
> which was used and perhaps the setting of a color key in a palette
> (look for other wine apps which uses, some of them must be using
> transparency). Further
Hi,
Apologies if you've already read this - I've been having trouble
getting the message to go through.
I just had a play around with Tango-ifying Wine. The end result was
quite pleasing. There aren't too many icons to deal with, so it's not a
long job.
All I've done here is swap out the shell32
I've just heard some good news on the Tango list. The Tango icons are
now public domain, which makes using them a much easier proposition.
I might see if I can improve the state of the shell32 icons at some
stage.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
I mentioned this issue before - and I agree. Personally I'm interested
in good integration across the whole of Wine - this includes for example
the icons which appear in the file dialogs. ReactOS have adopted Tango
to great effect.
The downside is that there's really no way of making Wine's icons
> Has anyone else noticed
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
> which is shown on the right side of
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
> It's kind of cool. Hats off to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
> who put it together.
> - Dan
Yes th
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 23:34 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Not really, you'll of course still need to build a full 32-bit version
> of Wine, the 64-bit Wine will never be able to run 32-bit apps. What
> needs to be improved is that the 64-bit loader should be able to forward
> automatically to
Nuvola is good, but I think Tango looks a lot nicer if it could be
available, and I think it blends with different platforms better - it's
designed specifically with that in mind. Nuvola looks very KDEish and
very very blue; not as good as Tango IMHO.
Does anyone know how gnome manages to handle t
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:43 +, Hervÿe9 Chanal wrote:
> > On Friday 14 November 2008 19:13:32 Juan Lang wrote:
> >
> > > > I find that a bit alarming. I'm sure he's working very hard, and doing
> > > > good stuff, but I don't think Wine should be redrawing anything. Not
> > > > when we have
s sort-of looked consistent with Windows
98. Now they don't look consistent with anything. Don't get me wrong:
the new icons I see aren't specially bad - it's just that they don't fit
with anything else.
I wonder if we can fix this.
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi Juan,
> The problem that I see with the new SVG icon support is that we use
> icotool to create the small-size icons from the SVG when the SVG is
> available. This rarely works well. I think we need to maintain
> hand-drawn small-size icons, and optionally use SVG to generate
> larger-size (l
o be working out pretty
well for them!
Any comments on that?
Best Regards
Joel Holdsworth
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi All,
Are there any plans to update the percentages on the Wine status page
any time soon? I'm curious to know how much progress has been made in
the past 10 months.
Regards
Joel Holdsworth
86 matches
Mail list logo
