I just made a "cvs diff..." and my chunk of code didn't match directly.
I see the commit now. Please forgive my sloppyness.
/ Jens
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexandre Julliard
Sent: den 23 september 2004 20:33
To:
I never get any response to my supplied patch.
I assume that there's something more wrong with it, but I can't _guess_
what it is.
Could anyone help me?
/Jens
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Collin
Sent: den 13 september
Please hold this patch and don't commit it yet.
I've been told that it contains things to be checked first.
/J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Collin
Sent: den 11 september 2004 21:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch: s
thanks a lot! New patch is on it's way :)
/Jens
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of James Hawkins
Sent: den 11 september 2004 19:51
To: Jens Collin
Cc: Alexandre Julliard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: resend: patch: shell3
TECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexandre Julliard
Sent: den 10 september 2004 22:22
To: Jens Collin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: resend: patch: shell32.dll - SHELL_ArgifyW expands env-vars
"Jens Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + {
> +
Is there anything wrong with this patch? I can't see my changes taken
place in CVS.
Let me know and I'll fix 'em.
/J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Collin
Sent: den 8 augusti 2004 17:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
D]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: patch: shell32.dll - SHELL_ArgifyW expands env-vars
Hi Jens,
--- Jens Collin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * lookup of envoronment-vars in SHELL_ArgifyW in shell32.dll added.
> (Such as %SystemRoot%).
Do you think you could write s
is something wrong with ShellExecute
itself (or rather FindExecutable) but I've contacted Francois
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to get some help on this.
Anyway, it partially adds a tiny function and it doesn't break anything.
Can someone commit this small patch for me please?
Thanks in ad
