On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chris Moeller wrote:
>
>
You should add a FIXME() for the SystemNumaHighestNodeNumber case since you
are not implementing the full behavior.
QEMU may be able to emulate NUMA so that may be worth a look (although the
man page sucks on the topic). It's been a whi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Christian Costa wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> That would be better to change the trace at the beginning by FIXME( "(%p,
> %d): semi-stub\n", info, size ); or FIXME( "(%p, %d): partial stub\n",
> info, size );
> instead of adding another fixme (which is not really correct
Dan, the patch doesn't build for 64-bit Wine. On the #else side you have
an unwanted semicolon.
--
Jim
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:37:27PM -0600, James Eder wrote:
> > As many of you no doubt know, GCC recently released 4.8.0. This new
> > version introduces a new optimization level enabled by -Og with the
> > follow
As many of you no doubt know, GCC recently released 4.8.0. This new
version introduces a new optimization level enabled by -Og with the
following description (from the man page):
"Optimize debugging experience. -Og enables optimizations that do not
interfere with debugging. It should be the opti
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Rico Schüller wrote:
> On 28.10.2012 16:13, André Hentschel wrote:
>>
>> - lpGData->lpRemoteData = lpNewData;
>> + lpGData->lpRemoteData = HeapAlloc( GetProcessHeap(),
>> HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof( dwDataSize ) );
>> + CopyMemory( lpGData->lpRemot
> Have you verified that this works correctly on all the platforms you are
> changing?
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> julli...@winehq.org
Having another look, some of the BSDs are lacking or gained support
only somewhat recently. I had thought the BSDs weren't so different.
For Apple we need 10.4
Hmmm... the GCC docs say:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.2/gcc/Type-Attributes.html#Type-Attributes
"Note that the alignment of any given struct or union type is required
by the ISO C standard to be at least a perfect multiple of the lowest
common multiple of the alignments of all of the m
Gah... hit the wrong reply button so here we go again for some.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Joris Huizer wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 05:49 PM, James Eder wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Chris Robinson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> O
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Chris Robinson wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 05:40 PM, James Eder wrote:
>>
>> +/* Intel says we need a zeroed 16-byte aligned buffer */
>> +char buffer[512 + 16];
>> +XMM_SAVE_AREA32 *state = (XMM_SAVE_AREA32 *)(((ULON
I've been kicking this patch set around in my local git tree for a
while and I want to get it out there for comments and maybe even
inclusion in Wine. Seeing some comments in another thread about
wineboot made me think I should get these patches out rather than
holding onto them much longer.
I fe
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
> First, there are some compiler warnings:
Fixed
> Then, you are off by an order of magnitude. You're dividing by 10 million
> rather than 1 million to go from Hz to MHz.
and fixed
> I would say you should probably remove that semi-stub warni
I've sent a patch set that I need some help testing. The first four
in the series should be fine as they don't change anything specific to
a particular platform. The last one however makes some changes which
are platform specific (affects Linux, Apple, and various BSDs). I've
tested the Linux co
>>
>> You obviously have absolutely no idea what the wine-mono package is for.
>> You should read up and apologize.
>>
>>
> NO APOLOGY! You are missing the point.
>
You are missing the point. You're argument lacks weight because you
clearly have no idea what you're talking about. One cannot bas
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> This comes up in one form or the other very often, though, doesn't it?
> Company x releases software y with a Wine wrapper advertising "native linux
> support" and users get upset. Personally, I'm glad they're thinking about
> Linux and I t
IMO, AppDB should gather enough information form the user to assign
the rating automatically. For example, answering "no" for "Installs?"
should automatically lower the rating. "Runs?" might be a bit too is
a bit too ambiguous. More over, the ratings should not be something
you have to click on
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Jarek Czekalski
wrote:
> There's a dead link on the page http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectDraw pointing
> to http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectDrawRenderer as DirectDrawRenderer. Is there
> any better place for such reports?
>
That's just the MoinMoin Wiki software at wor
On systems without the appropriate curses development files,
compilation is broken here:
gcc -m32 -c -I/home/james/build/wine/wine-git/dlls/kernel32 -I.
-I/home/james/build/wine/wine-git/include -I../../include
-D__WINESRC__ -D_KERNEL32_ -D_NORMALIZE_ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall
-pipe -fno-strict-ali
On 11/26/10 12:15 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
> wrote:
>> On 11/24/2010 07:19 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>>> On 11/24/10 6:56 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>>> On 11/24/2010 12:23 PM, jimportal at gmail.
19 matches
Mail list logo
