On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:27:16 +0200
Remco wrote:
> How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
> it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
> attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
> have the next major release be 2.0.
On Fri, 08 May 2009 19:41:31 -0700
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Anyway, please feel free to give way too much feedback :)
I like then but not the one with the folder on. The gray colour just does not
work for me.
On Fri, 8 May 2009 18:43:20 +0100
IneedAname wrote:
> Windows is not free. You can buy a EeePC running Linux that has 8GB more then
> the windows version.
Both the Linux and Windows versions are at the same price.
Sorry I send this email with out finishing it.
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:47:32 +0100
David Gerard wrote:
> Yes. The biggest problem for free-as-in-freedom software - Linux and
> GIMP, and to some extent Wine - is that Windows and Photoshop are
> effectively free-as-in-beer software ...
>
> http://autotelic.com/windows_is_free
Windows is not fre
On Sun, 3 May 2009 23:31:45 -0400
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
> +1. Or just remove priorities for users altogether.
Looks like some one is thinking round here!
That gets my vote to.
On Mon, 4 May 2009 22:12:04 +1000
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Ben Klein :
> > Then they disappear. There would be no way to search for metabugs, for
> > example, whereas at the moment you can search for Blockers. There's no
> > point in keeping metabugs if there's no
>
> SUSPENSE!
>
> Lost a
On Sat, 2 May 2009 16:52:06 +0200
Nicklas Börjesson wrote:
> 3. Major "Major loss of functionality for a wide range of applications
>
> - Isn't this just all bugs that has more than $arbitrary_number of
> applications linked to them? An aggregate, rather than a level?
In that case #16281
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:26:38 -0500
Austin English wrote:
> Apparently it keeps getting reinstalled. I encountered it yesterday
> when installing kernel updates and a few other things. I didn't bother
> to check what package is depending on it, only noticed it once my test
> results on http://test
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:58:00 +
Ricardo Filipe wrote:
> bug links are manually recoverable, searching bugzilla and linking should be
> easy, i can do that if you feel you don't have time to.
You can find a copy of wine appdb here http://ftp.winehq.org/pub/wine/
So someone may have a old copy
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard wrote:
> Yep. That's why a wiki is nice. If you open it up to everyone to
> contribute, you'll get bad stuff but you'll get good stuff you just
> wouldn't get otherwise. It's a great format to capture that.
We would use the same system for edit righ
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:10:59 +1100
Ben Klein wrote:
> A wiki is likely to be highly unsuccessful for AppDB when the focus is
> on test data.
I'm thing about the notes made by the app maintainers.
Not the whole AppDB.
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:36:11 +0100
Klaus Layer wrote:
> Rozanne just deleted an entry which was
> maintained by me. According to the email I received, there were duplicated
> entries for the programm Mapsource. I regard deleting entries from Appdb
> without giving the maintainer a chance to ba
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:08:02 -0600
Jeremy Newman wrote:
> Software upgrades complete.
So whats new?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It does not my detect distro version. Can that be done?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:11:20 +0100
Martin Hinner wrote:
> The problem is that some (almost all?) distributions simply execute
> .exe file when you click on it. I was amazed when testing JTAGTest on
> Linux! This is in my opinion quite big issue as ordinary users do not
> have problem clicking o
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:35:20 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie wrote:
> Yes, there are legit reasons to run as root, one of them is the now famous
> ICMP 'Ping' unavailability issue in Linux. Experts know about this and how
> to work around it. Newbies, used to Windows and how it works, just fi
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:20:47 -0500
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> Comments?
Can we have a wiki like change log for the notes in the AppDB to see whats be
changed when and by who.
Can we have a easy way for maintainers to (plan check for bugs give there
system spec and so on).
Sorry my spelling has
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:18:04 -0600
EA Durbin wrote:
> That and I can't the source code anywhere on their site.
Here is a copy of what I have send to then.
> I want the source code of the version(s) of Wine you package with your OS.
> If you have not read Wine's license now is the time to do so.
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:02:12 +0100
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
> What if we add a small questionnaire which will then pick the approprite
> Gold/Silver ... rating?
That what I like to see.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:48:34 +
Darragh Bailey wrote:
> Warcraft III and Frozen Throne expansion was released to support Windows
> 98/ME/2k/XP. Nowhere in it's patch notes does it say that the minimum
> requirements to run Warcraft 3 have changed to have the minimum
> requirements of Windows
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:46:06 -0500
Sparr wrote:
> I have not investigated the state of wine launchers in about a year
> now. Do any of those handle multiple WINEPREFIXes? That is the most
> important feature of Cedega's launcher that I was never able to find
> in a wine launcher. Thank you and
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:52:46 -0800
"Dan Kegel" wrote:
> http://wiki.winehq.org/AppsThatSupportWine is a nice
> stopgap, but perhaps it should be a report in the
> appdb, driven by a checkbox that maintainers can check.
> What do folks think?
You get my vote!
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:33:21 +1100
Peter Urbanec wrote:
> Speaking of dates... My pet peeve is seeing ambiguous dates such as
> 2/1/08. To me (and most of the world), that looks like 2nd Jan 2008, but
> it appears that millions of people in the USA see it as 1st Feb 2008.
> So, in the interest of
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:23:52 -0800
"Dan Kegel" wrote:
> ./configure --target=i686-unknown-gnu-linux
What does that do? It's not listed in "./configure --help".
For building 64bit wine I have to pass "--enable-win64".
32bit wine builds with just "make".
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 with an AMD64 proc
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:44:39 +0100
Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
> How should I publish it ?
http://repo.or.cz/w/wine.git?a=forks
Looks like Patchwatcher has being offline from 09-Dec-2008.
Did I miss something or did someone trip over the mains cable?
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:45:52 -0700
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new machine has a fairly modern nvidia card, so
> more of the tests are actually run.
Where can I find the spec of the new machine ?
Are you using the closed source driver ?
I want to see the full system spec hardware
27 matches
Mail list logo
