В сообщении от Friday 11 August 2006 17:17 вы написали:
> 2006/8/11, HolyLich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've sent patch several times, but it has not been applied.
>
> Why not use memmove() instead?
>
Heh, this problem was discussed before
http://www.winehq.org/pip
Hi,
I've sent patch several times, but it has not been applied.
Patch is reasonable, MIME type is OK.
patch -p0 < mbox works ;-) (as recommended at
http://winehq.org/site/docs/winedev-guide/style-notes)
Please, tell what I must do to this patch to be applied?
Thanks a lot
-- HolyLich
/www.physics.ucla.edu/~grosenth/jwpce.html - lots of metafiles).
Small pictures are OK, but large are jammed.
What is interesting, the bug affected bitmap part of metafile, so no errors
while PlayMetaFile,
but the result bitmap was jammed a little.
--HolyLich
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:37:09 -0400, Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fix rather unusual bug in LZ77 decompressor. We cannot use
> > memcpy
> > with overlapped areas because of unpredictable result. We must
> > copy byte-by-byte.
> Why don't you use memmove instead? The man page for m
> HolyLich wrote:
> > ChangeLog:
> > Fix rather unusual bug in LZ77 decompressor. We cannot use
memcpy
> > with overlapped areas because of unpredictable result. We must
copy
> > byte-by-byte.
> Why don't you use memmove instead? The man page f
