Windows.
This leave the choice for users to use wine on the safe side or on the less
safe side.
As I already answered to Marcus, I will go for some reflexion/documentation
on the subject,
Guillaume
2009/2/1 Paul TBBle Hampson
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Guillaume SH wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume SH
Date: 2009/2/1
Subject: Re: A basic implementation for increased security in wine proposal
To: Marcus Meissner
Hi Marcus,
I stand corrected, as it appears I was way too naive in my understanding of
software security, hence the example
n
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 09:11:29AM +0100, Guillaume SH wrote:
> > I tested the two modes with the help of wine test suite, restricted to
> > kernel/file.c, test_overlapped and I considered only :
> > all must-be-successful tests
> > GetOverlappedResult(0, N
Hi project,
Following the two previous threads, I am posting here a draft patch
implementing my proposal.
So, to begin with I will remind you the principle :
All function callable from outside wine, should be added sanity checks :
if safe_mode_on and (sanity_check1_failed or sanity_chec
Hi wine community,
I took some time for reflexion following the thread "A step in the wrong
direction, in an ocean of steps in the right direction" and to the
explanations some of you kindly exposed to me.
As a follow-up I am making a proposal.
A - The proposal
A1 - The core proposal
Al
Hi Dimitry,
Thank you very much for bringing this explanation to my knowledge.
As you name came over and over through wine-devel list, I am aware
that you are an experimented and influential member within wine
community (which make a huge difference with me, as this is the first
time I try to bri
Hi wine team,
First let me thank you for providing wine software witch I see as a
strong asset in the expansion of free software and as a useful tool
for people (like me) already using free software wherever possible. At
this point, Wine is at a very good level both in API coverage, quality
(less
