On Friday 16 December 2005 23:07, Aric Cyr wrote:
> Last time I checked gcc doesn't enable optimizations unless a -O option is
> specified explicitly (don't know if this has changed though).
I realize it is a moot point wrt the topic, but as you may know, there's an
easy way to check. Running
s
On Friday 13 May 2005 19:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Code using the C syntax described in the patent doesn't compile in winelib
> yet [snip]. Give me a week or two...
Imagine that, it seems I have once again imagined myself to have more spare
time than I really do. Honestly, fol
On Saturday 11 June 2005 03:37, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 6/10/05, Gregory M. Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do I run the wine test suite under Windows again? I want to do this
> > by compiling from source.
> >
> > I know the answer is out there --
How do I run the wine test suite under Windows again? I want to do this by
compiling from source.
I know the answer is out there -- maybe I have even asked this once before and
been given the answer? But I can't find it for the life of me.
--
gmt
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:16, Dimi Paun wrote:
> Also, I know you're modifying existing code, but if it's not
> too much to ask, 2-space indent is hard to read, and the vast
> majority of developers do prefer 4-space indent. So if you
> don't mind, and we can find a solution, would be great if w
Hello, as you may recall I would like to start playing with SEH macros for
winelib (and maybe wine). I have not done any wine development for a year or
so, and have not followed the mailing list very carefully.
Anyone have any advice for me wrt getting up-to-speed? I am aware of the wiki
and
On Friday 13 May 2005 15:09, Francois Gouget wrote:
> * The Slashdot summary makes it sound like Wine is infringing on the
> patent and that we will have to remove some code.
Wine duplicates many of the data structures in Windows which are described in
the patent. Code using the C syntax descr
On Monday 09 May 2005 10:00, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >"Jonathan Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Why doesnt someone just implement the microsoft SEH keywords and
> >> extentions into GCC like it should be?
>
> Do you have any knowledge of GCC, to be able to do it, or help me do it?
The code ex
On Monday 09 May 2005 11:29, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2005 07:41:46 +0000, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > As for the portability issue, why not an autoconf test? Perhaps the
> > answer is "because there are still people foolish enough to run distro's
> > o
On Friday 06 May 2005 18:51, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:23 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > They clearly won't work as is, but if your question is whether it's
> > possible to use attribute((cleanup)), then yes you could probably use
> > that to make the current macros more co
On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:27 am, Juan Lang wrote:
> Greg, you still lurking around here?
Yes. But I am worthless atm due to being totally swamped in preparation for
going overseas to study. Unfortunately, I am not optimistic about how much
time I will have once I am a student... howeve
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 07:44 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Another thing I'd really like to see is a move to GNU arch version control
>
> What do people think?
I'm using it at my new job and it's pretty dope imho. There are a few
downsides, some already have been mentioned (those--horrible--names,
On Thursday 26 February 2004 03:25 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Wow, fantastic! One thing, could you write up some basic info on
> the structure of format strings? I'm just a bit concerned that one
> day we'll have to rewrite the typelib marshaller to use this interpreter
> and not know how, as this stu
On Sunday 22 February 2004 03:49 pm, Robert van Herk wrote:
> maman yonatan wrote:
> >so if I understand you properly, you say that there is
> >no way doing from _outside_ of wine (no matter what
> >kind of com object I have), is that correct?
>
> Of course there is a way: you could make your own r
On Saturday 24 January 2004 02:06 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> OK, I'm not sure it's a virus (Don't have a win box at the moment), but
> this emails should go in any case.
> http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2004/01/0319.html
>
> Ivan.
It's almost surely Bagle, recently mentioned on t
On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:05 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Jeremy White wrote:
> >>Did any one contact Xaim to see if they can send any MONO people to
> >>wineconf?
> >>Is there any vision on how these 2 integrate?
> >> I haven't even touched MONO yet (& .NET for that mater), but from the
> >>loo
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 08:05 am, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> From the desk of Jeremy White (who is at LinuxWorld ATM).
>
> Hey folks,
>
> We've just launched a major new initiative, the
> CodeWeavers CrossOver Compatibility Center.
>
> You can check it out at
> http://www.codeweavers.com/site/comp
On Sunday 14 December 2003 10:05 pm, I wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2003 09:02 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I recently posted with problems running Microsoft's
> > Services for Unix under Wine. I only tried it out
> > of morbid curiosity, actually, and because MS was
> > offering it for free. The f
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:10 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 17:59, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > The pointer points to a structure like this:
> >
> > struct ExtractFileList {
> > LPSTR filename;
> > struct ExtractFileList *next;
> > DWORD unknown; // always 1L
> > } ;
On Saturday 03 January 2004 05:13 pm, Juan Lang wrote:
> having RPC be able to talk to a
> remote RPC server (running on Windows) ...
> That requires named pipes.
or tcp support
-gmt
On Sunday 28 December 2003 10:16 pm, Joshua Walker wrote:
> Hi all.
> On my ever winding quest to fill in the win32 API
> documentation, I have found, I think, an intresting
> issue.
> When the documentation is generated with
> c2man.pl, it checks the .spec file to see if the
> function i
On Sunday 28 December 2003 02:53 pm, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during playing with ie5.5 installer i noticed that the installing of some
> cab files failed directly after the extract call. Doing exactly the same
> extract call with the same cabinet file and the same content of the first
>
What about libs/unicode? I have no idea about that stuff, but isn't a
situation like this what those libs are for?
--
gmt
"It is to be the assent and ratification of the several States,
derived from the supreme authority in each State, the authority
of the people themselves. The act, therefor
On Saturday 27 December 2003 09:23 am, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Mike Hearn wrote:
> >This implementation is a little inefficient but without using a random
> >access binary db as Windows does (which I am not going to advocate) it's
> >the best we can do.
>
> Ok, I'm going to be flamed for this, but
On Friday 26 December 2003 06:27 am, Tom wrote:
> Anyone have any comments, or something they believe I should add
> before I send the patch?
>
> Tom
Kernel32
Split 16/32 function, finish moving stuff into ntdll (review FS & device
support)
Implement non-local named pipes and mailslots over
On Monday 15 December 2003 04:25 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:58, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > hmm, one minor difference... I use WINELOADER=/opt/wine/bin/wine (we
> > happen to have the same wine prefix)... perhaps the word "simply" above
> > w
On Monday 15 December 2003 03:45 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:04, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > FYI, I don't know if this makes things any different, but I simply
> > pointed WINELOADER to "wine", not wine-{p,k}thread, and it seems fine...
> &g
On Monday 15 December 2003 08:51 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this problem? I tried setting WINELOADER to point to
> wine-pthread, and while that allowed winedbg to load symbols it spewed
> loads of errors while doing so. Is there a proper fix for this?
>
> BTW I think the
On Sunday 14 December 2003 09:02 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I recently posted with problems running Microsoft's
> Services for Unix under Wine. I only tried it out
> of morbid curiosity, actually, and because MS was
> offering it for free. The free offer expired, but
> it's back again for a little wh
On Saturday 13 December 2003 10:39 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running wine in gdb appears to be broken with latest CVS:
>
> (gdb) file wine
> Reading symbols from wine...done.
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /opt/wine/bin/wine win
On Saturday 13 December 2003 04:40 am, Joshua Walker wrote:
> There is one thing that really bugging the heck out
> of me.
> Most of the API documentation is possessed by MSDN.
> In my humble opinion, this is a very dangerous and
> volatile place to have it.
>
> I was once t
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 04:30 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> "Gregory M. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > actually, AFAICS it's just looking at "wine"... where is a good place to
> > verify this (with a trace)? Perhaps this is the whole
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 01:52 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
> > Indeed. Looking at the loop in DEBUG_ReadExecutableDbgInfo, the values
> > of dyn.d_tag it iterates through look nothing like the output of "readelf
> > -d wine" (they should, right?)
>
> yup
> The numbers it shows me (after adding a t
On Saturday 06 December 2003 12:15 am, Eric Pouech wrote:
> not really, in fact not reading .so file is linked to being able (or
> not) to read the .dynamic section of the ELF header
Indeed. Looking at the loop in DEBUG_ReadExecutableDbgInfo, the values of
dyn.d_tag it iterates through look noth
On Monday 08 December 2003 06:21 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
> http://cvs.reactos.com/cvsweb.cgi/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/
Neat. Does it work well enough in ROS to support NT's native rpcrt4?
--
gmt
"It is to be the assent and ratification of the several States,
derived from the supreme authority in
On Monday 08 December 2003 04:44 pm, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> > -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Steven Edwards
> > Sendt: 8. december 2003 23:05
> > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Emne: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS
> >
> >
On Sunday 07 December 2003 02:58 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> > I tried that but it still crashes.
> > I think there is only the one in ~/.wine/config right?
>
> Anyway, even if Wine may be faulty, an X crash is always an X bug or an X
> driver bug :-)
>
> Best way to fix this is to do a +relay trace
On Friday 05 December 2003 04:15 pm, Chris Morgan wrote:
> I can see about making this change as I did it once before
> for the jack audio driver.
>
> Can someone fix the debug symbols issue? I've got a patch
> for the jack driver that I'm having trouble debugging
> without it :-P
I think this ma
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 12:57 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
> > poking around I find that the for loop in DEBUG_RegisterStabsDebugInfo
> > (in programs/winedbg/msc.c) never finds the .stab or .stabstr sections...
> > not sure if they are really there or not. For example, for ntdll, it
> > finds onl
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 01:02 am, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2003 12:31 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:01:22 +0100, you wrote:
> > > Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 19:51, Rein Klazes wrote:
> > >
On Monday 01 December 2003 12:31 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:01:22 +0100, you wrote:
> > Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 19:51, Rein Klazes wrote:
> > >>Still the same here. It can be a bug in Debian Sid of course, and the
> > >>with the flow of updates stopped ...
On Friday 28 November 2003 02:54 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
> Chris Morgan wrote:
> > Anyone taking a look at this? Eric?
>
> is this only happening with gcc 3.3.2 ? (winedbg works as expected
> here). Did Alexandre latest fixes to debug.l help ?
> A+
Same here with gcc-3.3.1, and in my VM with gcc-3
On Thursday 20 November 2003 02:26 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Ran into this while browsing the code, it seems to
> be a NULL pointer reference waiting to happen.
> Am I missing something?
>
> ChangeLog
> Bail when we're out of memory.
>
> Index: dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c
> ==
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:22 pm, Parzival Herzog wrote:
> On November 11, 2003 11:39, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> > I don't know how to solve your problem, but it would be a good idea if
> > you just installed
> > the latest CVS version.
>
>
>
> I' just too inexperienced and too isolated
On Thursday 06 November 2003 03:31 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> War crime tribunals, environmental protection treaties, privacy
> legislation, ... the ability to let chilling effects meet little or no
> significant organised obstacle has become the trademark of a certain
> breed of "freedom-loving" pe
On Thursday 30 October 2003 04:16 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> ncalrpc?
The preferred transport for local-to-self RPC/DCOM communications. In NT it's
implemented on top of "NT Ports" (see Undocumented NT), the advantge being
that this is fast. This RPC transport (but not the NT ports themselves) is
On Thursday 30 October 2003 02:35 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Thirdly, Greg recently mentioned "stubless proxies". Does anybody know
> where I can read about these?
>
> thanks -mike
Unfortunately, there isn't a ton of documentation -- or, more accurately, the
documentation that you may find is scatte
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 03:29 pm, Carlos Lozano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here goes some notes about how to install installshield 7 programs
> with the actual wine releases (sorry, i haven't been able to install
> without some natives DLLs).
Could you recommend any particular installer that fails t
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:25 pm, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 17:15, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>
>
> > For example, when posting an interview people may
> > want to ask little questions, etc., stuff that does not
> > belong on the mailing lists.
>
> Exactly, whenever a news post
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 08:17 am, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> Mmh! I have downloaded the PSDK from the MSDN site, and although it
> says Microsoft Platform SDK February 2003 in the Start menu it really
> was just downloaded one month ago and my comctl32.lib does not contain
> symbols for at least
On Sunday 19 October 2003 05:20 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:00:51 -0500, Sir Gregory M. Turner scribed thus:
> > which ostensibly would seem to contradict your prognosis... (although I
> > assume you are nevertheless correct -- this is not the root-dir
> >
On Saturday 18 October 2003 12:38 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alexandre - this is your area. Any ideas?
>
> Your glibc is using TLS. Support for that is not ready yet. Depending
> on your system you need to either set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 or install
>
On Saturday 18 October 2003 02:15 pm, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2003 01:57 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
> > With this
> > patch all of the objects for setupapi.dll can be built on
> > MS_VC with the PSDK. There are a few minor issues but nothing
> >
On Saturday 18 October 2003 01:57 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
> With this
> patch all of the objects for setupapi.dll can be built on
> MS_VC with the PSDK. There are a few minor issues but nothing
> to major
doesn't this:
-typedef struct _CABINET_INFOA {
+typedef struct _CABINET_INFO_A {
PCSTR
Does everybody's kernel32 named pipes test pass (in wine)? Named pipes are
acting very wierd here, lots of segfaults and other wierdness... the test
seems to freeze attempting to create the alarmThread in test_NamedPipe_2
(test 3 of 4). The wineserver holds up OK, but the client side looks a m
On Monday 13 October 2003 04:56 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> There already is an app that can do the menus, the ros explorer. If it was
> compiled as a winelib app, it would solve the menu problem, at least for
> who likes desktop mode (And the ros explorer makes wine look like a "real"
> emu
On Monday 13 October 2003 01:46 pm, Robert van Herk wrote:
> So, my question is: would it be enough to create just a Linux program
> that synchronizes with this directory? Can anyone give me an example of
> a lnk file that IS actually missing in a Start Menu directory, but is
> there in his Program
On Thursday 09 October 2003 08:54 pm, Tom Hibbert wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'm running DameWare Mini Remote Control under Wine here. This is a
> pretty cool setup as some of our clients
>
> have no windows servers (only linux), and the idea is that we can VNC to
> a Linux firewall or file server and the
On Monday 06 October 2003 10:32 am, Jon Griffiths wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Part 7 of oleaut32 updates.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
> License: X11
>
> Changelog:
>
> Jon Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +dlls/oleaut32/bool.c dlls/oleaut32/oleaut32.spec
>dlls/oleaut32/variant.c
> Implement the boolean low
On Friday 03 October 2003 07:04 am, Adam Connell wrote:
> I am yet another programmer trying to compile the MFC with winelib.
> I believe that I have the project configured correctly. I am currently
> working on getting it to compile. I am having trouble with Microsoft's
> extensions to C++ specifi
On Thursday 02 October 2003 05:42 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/readmes/README
> sounds very promising for those interested in virtual machines.
>
> Bye
Very impressive. I recommend the PDF at
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/netos/papers/2003-xensosp.p
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 09:59 am, Steven Edwards wrote:
> This is very kickass dude.
I concur. I've been fantasizing about looking into this stuff myself,
although so far I've always decided I had more pressing matters to look into.
But some of this stuff is just so cool... and frankly,
On Thursday 25 September 2003 12:21 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Annoying isn't it? The config file is not the right place to do this
> > anyway, better to have it hardcoded into loader/loadorder.c IMHO,
> > otherwise users will always forget to update
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 10:55 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > So, what I'm wondering now is: 1) Should I bother finishing it? OSS is
> > working fine for me again, and if someone else is going to fix the
> > existing ALSA driver, and 2) if the answer to qu
On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:16 pm, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 23:14, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> > whee! another glibc mystery...
>
> If so, why don't you say which glibc version you use and whether you
> upgraded recently?
good point. It's gentoo
whee! another glibc mystery...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wine_bld_nat $ wine
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wine_bld_nat $ strace wine
[[ snip ]]
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4035e000
mprotect(0x4002e000, 729088, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
mprotect(0x
66 matches
Mail list logo
