Re: RFC: OpenSSL vs NSS

dy confronted the same issues you face (eg. if you are packaging wine commercially, or whatever, and have varying concerns beyond that of the raw wine project itself). There is also; http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: docu update

On June 19, 2004 03:24 pm, Mike Hearn wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:01:31 -0400, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > > Excellent, I'm glad this was said. One only has to look at the swing > > away from binary-distributions as a case in point - people *want* to > > eliminate

Re: docu update

an separation between users and developers. In this respect, I find the Wine build system extremely impressive. autoconf et al are not the kindest of tools and Wine has no shortage of environmental challenges, yet the source tree seems to be very solid and clean base for people to work with. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: project David?

uot; hits the wires, the redistribution clauses of the (L)GPL apply ... Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: i810 audio fixes 1/2

On April 21, 2004 05:21 pm, Ryan Underwood wrote: > What about something like MAS (http://www.mediaapplicationserver.net)? Yeah, that'd probably do it :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: i810 audio fixes 1/2

have any details handy (I heard it over a beer with the guy who was organising it, but I didn't take notes :-). Then again, which "free X project" would be first to develop this? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: WININET: move to Windows sockets

ts", whatever they look like, afterwards. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: CryptoAPI

Hi, On April 5, 2004 10:57 am, "Jacek [KRunch] ChaÅupka" wrote: > Has anybody started implementing CryptoApi in WINE?? I know that Juan Lang has already been making inroads into this. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: Win32 packages released on sourceforge

ne pulling the CVS strings - surely there must be some painless way to trigger these "snapshot moments" from his end. That is, after timezones have been argued to hell and back, really the only place where the right moment for a useful test can be accurately determined (a

Re: +relay stops window output?

ry for the OT post, but this brightened up an otherwise dull lunch break. -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: RSABASE: enough implementation to get Steam to login

velopers of libcrypto.so (www.openssl.org) perhaps this might be the place? Does anyone have good refs/links to the corresponding win32 side of this? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: regedit: consistent formatting

ewrite mails into their preferred layout - eg. Dimi doesn't like attachments). However I'm curious that you thought noone was interested, because I for one have been very much looking forward to seeing how it works out! :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: Potential forum at linuxquestions.org

things their "own way" (whatever that may be). I prefer to use my own choice and configuration of news and mail clients than to have a web-based interface forced down my throat. But as I've yet to see a web-based forum that I liked, I may be biased... Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

shered in in the name of "protecting rights" when in fact it is invariably used to achieve quite the opposite. The issue is not whether you exercise a personal disobedience to it, because Wine itself certainly can't, but whether something can be done to aid efforts to overturn these laws. In the mean time, (and as long as people in the US are involved in Wine,) we're stuck with them. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: copy protection - was: Re: Is it time for playing games on WINE?

us pride in free speech and other convenient catch-phrases, but these flavours of legally bullying continue to pick up steam and the US is starting to repress itself on a scale they have so often criticised in other nations. But I'm digressing, again. Sorry. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: S3 texture compression patent

nforce it. More or less, IANAL, IMHO, just my $0.02, and various other hand-waving caveats are assumed. Of course, clarifications of this from any qualified opinions are most welcome. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

openssl-based win32 programs

under it, feedback would be welcome); http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-users&m=106626702426381&w=2 Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: attaching or inlining? what to do when you're stuck with a stupid mail client???[Ay

On October 10, 2003 01:48 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But if mailman can't do it, there would still be other ways to > > organise this, only they would be uglier and trickier. Do we actually > > know yet if someone

Re: attaching or inlining? what to do when you're stuck with a stupid mail client???[Ay

FWIW: I'm away soon for a few days, so you'll have to continue this without me (a fact which is no doubt to your infinite relief :-). On October 10, 2003 11:27 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Geoff Thorpe wrote: [snip] > I haven't dispatched you to the arc

Re: attaching or inlining? what to do when you're stuck with a stupid mail client???[Ay

On October 9, 2003 10:54 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On October 9, 2003 09:58 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > > look/feel/use, like "wine-cvs". I would have personally thought that > > attachments make more sense, because separating patches from text can > > be ambiguo

Re: attaching or inlining? what to do when you're stuck with a stupid mail client???[Ay

address that gets picked up easily by a virus so I don't think they should ever emit rule-based bounces, we've seen what happens with those damned spam filters. Instead, either forward them on as-is but with some noticable "flag" added, or /dev/null it. In the latter case, you could get around the obvious objection by creating another mail-alias that follows the same rules as the list-server but responds to the sender with parsing results. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: attaching or inlining? what to do when you're stuck with a stupid mail client???

;t "getting through" without the regular list-server having to bounce mails (like a bad spam filter). Just my $0.02. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: adding structures to headers

Hi Dimitrie, On September 9, 2003 10:49 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On September 9, 2003 10:34 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > > On the other hand, I *have* duplicated the interface > > verbatim in terms of using exactly the same element names, the same > > order of elements i

Re: adding structures to headers

On September 9, 2003 10:14 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > On September 9, 2003 08:40 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > > when adding missing functions and structure types to wine headers, to > > what extent can we copy-n-paste structure definitions from the > > documentation at m

adding structures to headers

Hi there, Quick licensing/copyright question before I submit something I regret: when adding missing functions and structure types to wine headers, to what extent can we copy-n-paste structure definitions from the documentation at msdn.microsoft.com web? IANAL. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe

could someone please stabilise the list server?

least) wine-cvs is still using winehq.com. Could someone please standardise on what this is going to be? I don't particularly mind what it is, but it would help if it was consistent across all the lists and didn't change without warning. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTE