On 2012-04-01, at 6:06 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> Ideally applications wouldn't care at all about this and use the caps
> instead, though in practice applications might use the PCI IDs for
> workarounds for driver bugs or for capability detection.
Sounds good, so then are you okay with the patch
Hi Jacek,
First I'd like to put a disclaimer, that I'm extremely new to this, so please
forgive me if I don't understand most of the behaviours and dependancies. That
being said, I will try my very best to dig as much as I can to find out more.
On 2012-04-01, at 7:08 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> t
On 2012-04-01, at 6:57 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> Does the Windows driver really distinguish
> between these?
I'm not sure if it does, if the matching is only on the vendor and device ID,
then it's unlikely.
However isn't it important for wine to still distinguish between models (if
possible)
On 2012-03-31, at 4:49 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 31 March 2012 21:20, Gaurav Jain wrote:
>> CARD_AMD_RADEON_HD6600M = 0x6741,
>> +CARD_AMD_RADEON_HD6750M = 0x6741,
> If those are actually supposed to be the same, I don't think there's
>
