Hi,
Could we add gdiplus to the bugzilla components list?
thanks.
--
Evan Stade
On 8/3/07, Nigel Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/3/07, Nigel Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c b/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> > > index 84dd4c8
oc(GetProcessHeap(), 0,
> (strlen(value)+1)*sizeof(WCHAR));
> +MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, value, -1, wvalue, strlen(value)+1);
> +}
>
> set_reg_key_ex(root, wpath, wname, wvalue, REG_SZ);
>
> --
> 1.4.1
>
>
>
>
You need to initialize wvalue to NULL
--
Evan Stade
On 7/30/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [try2]
> * matched braces style of rest of file
> * spread code out to make it more readable
> * simplified use of gdi_to_x11_dashes
>
> dlls/winex11.drv/graphics.c |3 +
> d
On 7/26/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch is needed to prevent wine from crashing on the test that
> comprises my next patch
>
> dlls/gdi32/pen.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Evan Stade
>
a 50-page real-world presentation.
--
Evan Stade
etween LineOnOffDash and
LineDoubleDash in X11DRV_SetupGCForPen.
--
Evan Stade
On 6/29/07, Koshelev, Misha Vladislavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/27/07, Evan Stade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [try2] The patch I sent yesterday was not properly todo_wined. Also,
> this test is a bit more extensive (about twice as many points drawn).
> It us
On 6/27/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
[try2] The patch I sent yesterday was not properly todo_wined. Also,
this test is a bit more extensive (about twice as many points drawn).
It uses various point-type combination (even non-sensical ones such as
PT_LINETO | PT_MOVETO) t
On 6/26/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was talking with Julliard about the implementation of paths in GDI+.
He suggested that the right way to do it was to build paths directly
(i.e. not calling into GDI). I'm not sure why calling into GDI is
undesirable. There
direction. Can anyone suggest another reason why this approach is
flawed?
--
Evan Stade
On 6/19/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Try2: This time the rowsize is correctly aligned (on 4-byte
boundaries) and palette-mode PNGs are allowed as well as RGB-mode
PNGs.
Changelog:
*added support to decode some PNG files
*added check for png.h / dynamic loading of lib
ine to run dos .com programs
(including via cmd.exe). It gets stuck in an infinite loop in DOSVM.
Is there some trick to getting .com programs running?
--
Evan Stade
On 6/15/07, Vitaly Lipatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CreateFile is not success with somename.vxd (somename.vxd.so
exists in /usr/lib/wine)
As known open_vxd_handle( LPCWSTR name ) in kernel32/vxd.c have
to open dummy file in the wineserver directory.
It try use NtCreateFile for open Unix path /
On 6/13/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
changelog:
*implemented GdipDrawImage
dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus.spec |2 +-
dlls/gdiplus/graphics.c | 28
include/gdiplusflat.h |1 +
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
-Evan
On 6/12/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Changelog:
*implemented GdipDrawLineI
dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus.spec |2 +-
dlls/gdiplus/graphics.c | 16
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
-Evan Stade
Sorry, to clarify: this series of patche
On 6/12/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mo, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 -0700, Evan Stade wrote:
> +
> +status = GdipCreatePen1((ARGB)0x00ff, 10.0f, UnitPixel,
> &pen);
> +
> +todo_wine
> +expect(GdiplusNotInitialized, status);
On 6/10/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Any reason why are you creating a new pen in GdipDrawRectangleI, and while
using
> >> an existing one in GdipDrawLineI?
> >>
> >&
Hi,
I want to make some real applications work with the built-in wine
GDI+. Does anyone know of some programs that use GDI+ that would be
good for guiding my development?
thanks,
Evan Stade
On 6/8/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipDrawLineI(GpGraphics *graphics, GpPen *pen, INT x1,
> +INT y1, INT x2, INT y2)
> +{
> +HGDIOBJ old_obj;
> +
> +
On 6/8/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipFillPie(GpGraphics *graphics, GpBrush *brush, REAL x,
> +REAL y, REAL width, REAL height, REAL startAngle, REAL sweepAngle)
> +{
>
On 6/1/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Do, 2007-05-31 at 18:02 -0700, Evan Stade wrote:
> Changelog:
> *Added GDI+ public headers
> *Added some implementation (pen.c, gdiplus.c, memory.c)
> *Added two tests (pen.c, init.c)
I good indicator, that the Patch
++
include/GdiplusGpStubs.h | 10 +
include/GdiplusInit.h| 26
include/GdiplusTypes.h |7 +++
16 files changed, 462 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-Evan Stade
diff --git a/dlls/gdiplus/Makefile.in b/dlls/gdiplus/Makefile.in
index f1d5040
On 5/28/07, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well the Platform SDK headers use C++. From gdiplus.h:
>
> ...
>namespace DllExports
>{
>#include "GdiplusFlat.h"
>};
&
On 5/26/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to write conformance tests for gdiplus and that requires the use
of
> c++. Even if I were to focus on the gdi+ flat api, the windows SDK
headers
> for t
compile
c++ in the wine environment. What do I have to do to be able to write these
tests?
-Evan Stade
I think all the files that Mounir said to include are all modified
automatically or by Julliard
"You should not include any autogenerated code, that was created from
'autoconf' or a tool inside 'tools/' ( tools/make_makefiles or winedump as
examples), when you submit your Patch to winehq.org"
On
27 matches
Mail list logo
