Andreas Mohr wrote:
> And exactly this information should probably be stated in the wine-patches
> subscription welcome mail.
>
> "If for some reason the Wine patches you submit fail to get applied,
> then we'd appreciate you taking the effort of submitting your current patch
> as a new item at b
After having followed this thread for some time, I feel that there is an aspect
that is often missed in the debate.
As I see it, it would appear that Wine contributors fall into essentially two
camps. There are those who develop Wine for Wine's sake. This category includes
the core developers, and
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051202)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dr J A Gow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Winetools -> wine doors
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Rep
Karl Lattimer wrote:
Fair point that it has been useful to you, it has been useful to me
also. Here's what I see.
* An over complicated bash script, with way too many difficult to
maintain parts
* An inflexible application, which can only have new applications added
to it by the maintainer
*
I've looked through the winetools code and it is a clusterf*ck of
nonsense. It appears to be in the final stages of code rot, however
This "clusterf*ck of nonsense" helped me to get a microcontroller
development suite running under Wine, which otherwise would not install
natively. After over t
Hi,
I found that the following patch, committed to CVS on 23/02/06
at 20:33:06 made all my Wine system fonts squashed up and unreadable, which
in turn made a mess of formatting in some dialog boxes. I backed the
patch out from a current tree and the problem went away. Anyone else see
this
Thanks for the comments. Patch now resubmitted as two chunks as suggested.
John.
Mike McCormack wrote:
Dr J A Gow wrote:
FROM: Dr J A Gow
PATCH: Provides fix for bug 4436, some reference counting fixes, and
now the IStorage correctly handles the following
Dr J A Gow wrote:
It is as I thought that there is some issue with the object destructor
for the storage object being called and not actually releasing the
object. I have attached the complete patch to the tests for storage32 to
I have just had another thought on this and wonder if anyone
Hello All,
I wrote this some time ago:
Dr J A Gow wrote:
Hello All,
I have some regression problems relating to Wine in a commercial ECAD
app 'Easy-PC' version 9.0, available from http://www.numberone.com
Since then I have been doing some more digging into the problem and hav
Thanks for the advice Dan. I have done this now, and the bug report is
entered into the database as bug #4436. As I say I am more than happy to
help the developers debug this, providing someone can work with me in
respect the operation of this portion of the userland Win32 API with
which I have
Hello All,
I have some regression problems relating to Wine in a commercial ECAD
app 'Easy-PC' version 9.0, available from http://www.numberone.com
The application was quite usable on Crossover Office 4.2, with just some
minor dialog corruption. Alpha versions of Wine available at the same
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
