On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:24:58AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote:
> Ben Klein wrote on May 4th:
> >
> >Final post from me.
> >
> >2009/5/5 Nicklas Börjesson :
> >> b) I thought that priority was developer priority and severity was
> >> severity for the users.
> >
> >Nope. Both for the benefit of deve
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:42:14AM +0100, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Klein writes:
>
> Ben> 2009/2/11 nn :
> >> Fully automated bisecting with "git bisect run" [LWN.net]:
> >> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/317154/5dec0c8146e58b61/
> >>
> >> Would this be useful to
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:46:00PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Juan Lang writes:
>
> > Is this better? This trades a single call to sched_getaffinity per
> > process to one every time the process affinity is queried. This seems
> > safer, since a non-Wine process can also change a proces
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> [...]
> > > If you don't need to manually install the third-party library on a stock
> > > installation of the application's officially supported Windows platform
> > > (e.g. Wow on
Actually just spotted that some of the features are approved on the wish
list, so it seems that OpenAL will include them in it's next
specification.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:46:51AM +0000, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:16:12PM -0700, Chris Robinson wrote:
> &g
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:16:12PM -0700, Chris Robinson wrote:
> It's not very easy to get DirectSound working on top of OpenAL. I actually
> made a DSound->OpenAL wrapper (as a native C++ Win32 DLL, so it can't go into
> Wine as-is even if I wanted it to), but it's none too stable. Some apps wo
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:53:17PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy White wrote:
> >> We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728
> >>
> >> There were s
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 07:23:57AM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Darragh Bailey wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:38:15PM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > Believe that building deb packages will strip debuging symbols from the
> > binaries but unlike rpm does no
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:38:15PM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Almost all bugs that come from Ubuntu users don't have usable backtraces.
> Instead they have this:
>
> Process of pid=0008 has terminated
> No process loaded, cannot execute 'echo Modules:'
> Cannot get info on module while no pr
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:27:34PM +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a problem loading a specific proprietary driver.
> I traced the problem to two bugs in:
>
> - services
> - winedevice
>
> The two bugs caused the loading to fail.
> I created and tested two fixes to solve the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 07:03:20PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've received +50 copies of this e-mail now with full attachments flooding my
> inbox. Is there a bug at my ISP or is there a bug in the mailman software ?
>
> Thanks,
> --HPS
Most likely a problem on the gmail side.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:44:05AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> It would be hard to recognize later versions of the same patch,
> even with the '(try 2)' convention, since they often get split
> and munged while being beaten into submission.
> So Patchwatcher would have to have a way for developers to
Have you considered using some of the tools out there for automated
builds and looking to integrate patchwatcher to extend them to suit your
purpose.
A number of the features you suggest below are most likely already
implemented within existing automated builds.
I currently use buildbot at work f
Tried posting the following question on wine-users. I suspect that those
behind the creation of the mechanism by which wine creates launchers
from windows shortcuts don't read that list.
- Forwarded message from Darragh Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
I'm trying to tra
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:57:39PM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> TheBlunderbuss wrote:
> > It has just occurred to me that safedisc copy protection (bug 219!)
> > wasn't put on the Wine 1.0 task list. It's a pretty major bug and covers
> > a wide range of programs, with a wide range of saf
I'm been looking at bug 9628 (and duplicate 1) whenever I get the
time to work on wine these days. I've gone through various tests, enough
to determine that msiexec on Windows must use some custom command line
parsing in order for it to work for the cases listed in those bugs given
that the beh
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:56:08AM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a good point, we could certainly prevent running wineprefixcreate
> > as root in that case too, that would probably solve most of the
> > p
Wondering what flavour of Windows XP people would recommend for testing
on? Is there any benefit to getting Professional over the Home edition?
Or does Home have everything that is needed to be capable of developing
and testing conformance tests?
--
Darragh
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficien
I was hoping to be able to submit some patches for wine over the
christmas holidays. So I'm trying to sort out with work any legalities
with regards to my employment contract and working on other projects.
Basically the contract states that they own what I do, unless I get
permission from the rele
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: xlviewer install cmdline passed from CreateProcessA to msiexec
looks wrong
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After doing further debugging I've come to the conclusion that the
behaviour found when I was looking at bug 9628 is indeed a bug and have
logged a new on
OK, long time lurker, only recently decided to try my hand at coding for
wine.
Picked a bug 9628 and decided to have a bash.
Bug occured because a patch to the msiexec command line parsing was
reverted due to regressions in the xlviewer installer and other apps. I
don't know about the other apps,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 05:38:36PM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
> Torsdag 30 august 2007 13:19, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Hi,
> > sometimes app-entries (like Acrobat Reader) are for series of
> > applications and versions for the single applications. Sometimes there
> > are app-entr
Quoting EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What makes copy protection problematic to circumvent is not the math or the
technical stuff, it is the laws protecting it :-(
how does cedega do it?
They license the code for the copy protection detection from the likes
of macrovision.
--
Darragh
"
23 matches
Mail list logo
