On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Claudio Fontana
>> wrote:
>>> I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
&g
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Claudio Fontana
wrote:
> I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
> issues under windows older than XP SP3).
>
> The patch contains changes based on your feedback.
Which is completely broken, since the U() macr
I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
issues under windows older than XP SP3).
The patch contains changes based on your feedback.
Some things I stand by, and won't change.
If you feel differently, you should argue for their validity a little
bit more than "don't us
work on all items you mentioned,
so if you want to cannibalize it and do things differently, you are
more than welcome to take what you need from my patch.
Some comments on your comments below :)
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 4:21 AM
package is built from source and
installed in the default prefix (/usr/local).
Thanks,
Claudio Fontana
I tried to work on the patch again, but it does not apply anymore.
I am slowly going through what happened in profile.c, to find out
which changes should be kept,
and which go in a wrong direction.
I stumbled already @the first entry:
commit 9a10234ef2b5212ba44b82a797c478f190b4dad1
Author: Paul V
Paul Vriens wrote:
Claudio Fontana wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Paul
Vriens wrote:
Claudio Fontana wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Paul Vriens
wrote:
Claudio Fontana wrote:
Just a reminder to everyone involved with profile.c:
I have watched the git log of the somewhat
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Paul Vriens
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just a reminder to everyone involved with profile.c:
>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>
>> Just a reminder to everyone involved with profile.c:
>>
>> I have watched the git log of the somewhat recent changes to
>> kernel32/profile.c.
>>
>> The profile API does n
interested, you can contact me for further details, or look
at the testcases in my last patch (search for profile.c / Claudio
Fontana).
A good fix in profile.c is difficult because of the unfortunate use of
the empty string as sentinel in the implementation. Probably rewriting
the module would be a
Hello all,
I was wondering if there's anything wrong with my patch to
kernel32/profile.c and its tests:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/035468.html
It fixes a problem that causes applications built with Multimedia
Fusion to fail under wine,
since the "INI object" of M
Hello,
following up on the profile changes started on this thread:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-December/053009.html
I tried a patch in git format made against latest. First attempt at
using git, that is.
dlls/kernel32/profile.c: allow section and key names of zero length
dll
Hello,
I noticed that you are using function_grep.pl to search for
a certain function.
Have you considered GNU idutils?
They can do that and more (and faster):
http://www.gnu.org/software/idutils
It is as simple as
$ cd $WINE_SRC_PATH
$ mkid (generate ID database, takes about 4 seconds on my ma
Hello Robert,
On 12/24/06, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Claudio,
The patch looks good, apart from the specific version check for win95.
Do you think you could add some tests to our test framework
(dlls/kernel32/tests) to test for this issue that you've found. Then the
tests cou
Hello,
while tweaking other things in kernel32, I noticed that latest version
fails a test in locale.c:
$ cd dlls/kernel32/tests
$ make test
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p
kernel32_test.exe.so locale.c && touch locale.ok
locale.c:1990: Test failed: Enumerated gr
implementation
is incorrect, and a patch fixing it by not requiring name[0] to be !=
'\0' is likely to be accepted? (btw, I've noticed you switched to git,
so I will be using that instead now).
Thanks,
Claudio Fontana
16 matches
Mail list logo
