Was there a specific game that you wanted to test here?
I have not tried to install any game that required it, but I can if you
want something tested.
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone managed to get sony's s
+ ! ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.dylib >/dev/null 2>&1
>
> Best regards,
> - --
> Anderson Lizardo
On Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 the man page for test say -e checks if the
file exists, and -L checks if the file exists and is a symbolic link.
-e is not avaliable in the shell sh, there is no mention if -L works or
not in sh.
It might be a problem for just Solaris 8, or the tests are/were ran in the
sh shell.
--
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
In the WWN #277 there is mention that I am using Solaris 9 while
attempting to get Wine to work. I am actually using Solaris 10 not
Solaris 9.
What I did was compare what was different between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10
so I could figure out what the problem is/was.
--
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
> Chuck Hall wrote:
>> Started to go through this and found something intresting. lwp.h does
>> exist and is found, so HAVE_SYS_LWP_H is defined. The test for
>> _lwp_create fails. Looking a bit deeper I found that the lwp.h for
>> Solaris 9 is different from the
> Chuck Hall wrote:
>> Well it looks good. I did get a few failures on the patching, but it
>> wnet
>> through 'make depend' without a problem.
>>
>> Now I run into the problem in kthread.c:
>> sed -e 's,@bindir\@,/usr/local/bin,g' -e
&
> of worried about doesn't make sense anymore -- looks like the DLL import
> stuff moved from the data segment to the text segment. I don't know if
> that is going to cause problems on sparc or not...
>
> I'll be trying to get the current wine running this afternoon; I'll post
> something when it's working.
I look forward to hearing how this turns out.
--
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
h this file when I compile?
> Im using this version of Wine: Wine-20030618.tar.gzin a Solaris 8
> (SPARC)
> How can I know if winelib is correctly installed?
Did you install the development libaries when Solaris was installed? If
you did not that would explain why you are not linking string.h.
One other thing that might help is to try using the current release or
CVS. Based on the date of the wine you are attempting to use, it has been
almost 2 years, many changes have been done in that time.
Winelib will not be installed if the make failed.
--
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Eric Frias wrote:
> Chuck Hall wrote:
> > I should have mentioned what tools I'm using and the why I sent the patch.
> > I am using the native Sun assembler and linker. The Sun assembler does
> > not understand the .previous so that is the reason
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Eric Frias wrote:
> Chuck Hall wrote:
> > I have heard that people are using Wine on Solaris. I would like to know
> > if they are using Wine on the SPARC version or the x86 version of Solaris?
>
> I'm using it on the Sparc version, with Sola
Solaris
version.
I have attached a small patch that allows me to get throught the 'make
depend' section of the compile. Since it is my first patch, please look
at and let me know what I did wrong :)
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
--- wine-0523/include/wine/port.h 2005-05-23 10:30:57.884606000 -050
m of the interlocked function missing. I still get the same
problem of the function not existing.
I did try setting the build and the host variable to i686 in configure.
When I get to the make part it states that the asm is not a valid 64 bit
base/index expression.
Would you mind adding a link to your website so I can try the patches?
Have Fun!
Chuck Hall
11 matches
Mail list logo
