On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Edward Savage wrote:
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/05/31/237208/judge-rules-apis-can-not-be-copyrighted
>
> Have you considered talking to your local version of the EFF?
>
> Edward
>
Thank you for your kind advice, and for the link you provided. I'll
consid
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Roderick Colenbrander
wrote:
> Have a look at what Google does for the Linux headers in Android. They
> essentially process them with a script and remove comments, inline
> functions and other stuff. There have been various articles about it.
> Look at the argument
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ricardo Filipe
wrote:
> yeah, what happens is the header is reimplemented, not simply
> copy-pasted from Windows.
> Even if the API is not copyrighted, the header contents still are.
>
Well if you rewrite a header such that it is 100% compatible with an
API (which
* different, but for the compiler, the API *needs* to be the
same.
Since you seem to have the same problem with wine (and you probably
dealt with it succesfully), I wanted to ask you how you are solving
this problem. Do you "rewrite" the headers? Do you copy them "raw"?
Thank y
