On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:32 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only solutions I see are:
> >
> > + Leave it as it is (and hard luck to anyone who uses dates in the range
> > 1/1/100 to 1/1/1601)
>
> Tha
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:07 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:22 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> >> Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >> Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:22 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN and 1601
>
Has this been rejected out of hand or is it still being considered?
Bill
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 13:34 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:29 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59P
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:29 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> > > Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
> > > Presumably OLE2
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
> > Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack
> > space?
Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack
space?
Bill Medland
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 18:05 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 12:28 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
> >
> > On one machine the text displays correctly.
> > On the other the characters are totally w
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 12:28 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
> Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
>
> On one machine the text displays correctly.
> On the other the characters are totally wrong
setting WINEDEBUG to +font the one weird thing I note is that on the
m
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 22:08 +0100, Nick Law wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:03:03AM +0100, Nick Law wrote:
> >
> >> Nick Law wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, I don't quite know what happened there with the fonts, however
> >>> my fonts are now back working by deleting the
Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
On one machine the text displays correctly.
On the other the characters are totally wrong
If I install the arial32.exe then the characters are displayed correctly
and attractively
If I remove the sserife.fon (and the arial fonts) then the char
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 12:03 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> MS-Windows's RegQueryKeyInfo function test result:
>
> 1. MSDN means TCHARS when it says 'character' for this function.
> ==> No.
> 2. why RegQueryInfoKey is returning a number that is too small
> ==> No. Currently Wine's
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 06:17 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 02:18 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently regedit is not defined "UNICODE".
> > >
> > > The
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 02:18 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently regedit is not defined "UNICODE".
>
> The point are "max_val_name_len", "valName", "valNameLen".
> Not max_val_size, valSize.
>
> RegQueryInfoKey set the "max_val_name_len" to the size of the longest
> value name, in c
Can someone remind me how we used to set the debug channels back in late
2004?
On Wed, 2007-28-03 at 08:41 +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
> > weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
> > searching for it if it is obvious to s
On Tue, 2007-27-03 at 23:32 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag 27 März 2007 23:18 schrieb Bill Medland:
> > I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
> > weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
> > searc
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
wine: Call from 0x126ce72 to unimplemented function
nspr4.dll.PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize, aborting
wine: Unimplemented
On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 16:45 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 3/20/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/20/07, Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there something wrong with the list server?
> > >
> > > I am being bomba
Is there something wrong with the list server?
I am being bombarded with last year's emails.
Bill Medland
On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 21:12 +0100, Vit Hrachovy wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
>
> >> b) Enhance regedit to be able to output to STDOUT. By default registry
> >> search output is done to a specified file. It can be redirected to
> >> STDERR, though. (tested on 0.
y files - 'wineflushregistry'.
>
> b) Enhance regedit to be able to output to STDOUT. By default registry
> search output is done to a specified file. It can be redirected to
> STDERR, though. (tested on 0.9.29, 0.9.33)
>
c) Use the shell
wine regedit -e /tmp/$$.reg && cat /tmp/$$.reg && rm -f /tmp/$
$.reg
> Regards
> Vit Hrachovy
>
>
>
--
Bill Medland
On Thu, 2007-08-03 at 06:40 +1100, Nathan Williams wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I have been planning to do some work on wine for a while now, but
> after I started working I got myself a new programming job.
>
> I'm worried about the copyright of any external work I do, so I need a
> little advice.
>
On Wed, 2007-28-02 at 09:43 +0100, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:17:04 -0800
> Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any chance that someone with the ability can create the fedora
> > core 4 wine rpms for version 0.9.30?
> >
Is there any chance that someone with the ability can create the fedora
core 4 wine rpms for version 0.9.30?
Bill Medland
't see any RedHat 8 or 9 there. Are they not there or
am I looking in the wrong place?
--
Bill Medland
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:19 +0100, Wojciech Arabczyk wrote:
> Hello
>
> > trace:wininet:HTTP_GetResponseHeaders raw headers: L"HTTP/1.1 302
> > Found\r\nDate: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:47:17 GMT\r\nServer: Apache/2.0.54
> > (Debian GNU/Linux)\r\nLocation:
> > http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourcefor
On Fri, 2007-12-01 at 13:45 +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> At first:
> Congratulations for the commit of your Patches.
>
>
> On Do, 2007-01-11 at 09:29 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
>
> > Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Implement GetInstalledDrivers i
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 07:56 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Wine-0.9.27's iexplore.exe isn't downloading gecko for me.
> It tries, but then gives up, and says html rendering is disabled.
> +wininet shows that it did connect to winehq.org and got
> a redirect to sourceforge:
>
> trace:wininet:HTTP_GetRes
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:38 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:11 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> > > On 1/8/07, Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Bill Medland ([EMAIL
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:11 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Add tests structure to odbccp32
> >
>
> You need to add tests for this patch to be accepted. Also, you've
On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 16:14 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Implement SQLGetInstalledDrivers
> Implement a basic SQLInstallerError
> Add test framework and some initial tests
Would it help if this was split into three patches?
doesn't do and its refusal to let me
have any control.
Is it just me or is it the program?
(and can anyone tell me how to stop it wrapping
and if not then the patch will have to wait until monday :-(
)
--
Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
umentation :-)
I see we have both the old sgml-based docs (which are now on
sourceforge) and the wiki.
I presume we are maintaining both (i.e. we have not obsoleted the docs).
So where do we send patches to the sgml these days? Still to wine-
patches?
Then (I'm using urlmon as a model
e-engineer the
process.
--
Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A004BA90B}" ->
0x7ed40810
trace:ole:CoGetClassObject
CLSID: {79eac9e2-baf9-11ce-8c82-00aa004ba90b},
IID: {0000-0000--c000-0046}
err:ole:CoGetClassObject apartment not initialised
*** HUH ??? ***
TIA
Bill Medland
it shouldn't, it wouldn't affect the
> calling function on x86 since the eax register would have been
> assumed to be trashed anyway.
I find it confusing and the C standard (1999) explicitly states
that it is not permitted.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On May 4, 2006 07:19 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >trace:ole:CoUnmarshalInterface (0x7be8c7a8,
> > {b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}, 0x7be8c794)
> > trace:ole:get_unmarshaler_from_stream Using custom
> > unmarshaling trace:ole:CoCreateInstance
On May 4, 2006 04:14 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >So, my next problem
> >
> >What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
> >out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed
> > (in which case I am trying to find out w
So, my next problem
What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed (in
which case I am trying to find out why our case is different) or
is it still only just started?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 2, 2006 11:44 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >before I start trying to get up to speed on it.
> >
> >
> >Anyway; if someone is already working on that sort of thing
> > then there is probably little point in me trying to learn it
>
is then I guess I will start trying to learn
it.
Comments?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
ast part of C99
But then how to get LLONG_MAX set when compiling up wpp. I
managed to hack it by adding std=gnu99 to the CFLAGS in the
makefile but that is hardly portable.
Can someone give a better suggestion? Is there something we are
already checking in the configure that we can use
On April 21, 2006 06:58 pm, Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin
Navea) wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > I have just noticed that configure is telling me
> > "Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing"
> >
> > Why does it think that?
> >
> > (
On April 21, 2006 10:46 am, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > I have just noticed that configure is telling me
> > "Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing"
> >
> > Why does it think that?
> >
> > (freetype-devel version 2.1.
I have just noticed that configure is telling me
"Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing"
Why does it think that?
(freetype-devel version 2.1.9 is installed)
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
I just tried wrc for the first time and fell over this.
Internal error (please report) ./ppl.l 824: long long constants
not implemented yet
Is anyone intending doing anything about it in the near future?
Is it a reasonably simple thing to implement?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ws program) rather than a true Linux application.
>
> This is a link to the API:
> http://www.cmsfx.com/en/platform/VTapi/
>
> Thanks,
> Klaus
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
really
mean that?
"If the length is explicitly stated to be zero then don't do the
calcrect but if the length is to be measured and happens to come
out as zero then do do the calcrect"
If so then I suggest at least a comment that it is deliberate; it
sounds counterintuitive to me.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On December 22, 2005 06:15 pm, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> > +static const WCHAR dfv[] = {
> > +'M','S',' ','S','h','e','l','l',' ','D'
On December 20, 2005 02:56 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Commit: e0d4df6bb7c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
> URL:
> http://source.winehq.org/git/?p=wine.git;a=commit;h=e0d4df6bb7
>c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
>
> Auth
late stage, or do we?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
;);
Later on that default font can be referenced without testing if
it is non-null
In my particular case it is null (because the property is not
found).
Presumably if msi_dup_property returns null then some other
default should be used, e.g. MS Shell Dlg.
Any comments? Anyone volunteering t
On December 15, 2005 01:00 am, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:51 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > I am intending doing some work and submitting some patches
> > to "improve" the integration with the operating system
> > desktop integration. Rath
On December 15, 2005 01:00 am, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:51 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > I am intending doing some work and submitting some patches
> > to "improve" the integration with the operating system
> > desktop integration. Rath
I will see what I can do about looking up the handler
for the file type and going from there (possibly even using the
native OS's handler e.g. pdf files).
Any complaints?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On December 8, 2005 02:40 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
> On December 8, 2005 09:15 am, Bill Medland wrote:
> > On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
> > > > --- Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > So I turn on WINDEBUG=+r
On December 8, 2005 09:15 am, Bill Medland wrote:
> On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
> > > --- Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > So I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being
> > > > passed.
> > > >
&
On December 8, 2005 09:40 am, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >>Wine crashes the first time it enters/uses a entry/function
> >>using the debug setup from ntdll/relay.c:RELAY_SetupDLL.
> >>(Which happens to be a RtlInitUnicode in
> >>kernel/m
On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
> > --- Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being passed.
> > >
> > > And wine segfaults.
> > >
> > > Anyone know what is going
I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being passed.
And wine segfaults.
Even
export WINEDEBUG=+relay
wine --version
which yields
0009:Call kernel32.__wine_kernel_init() ret=77ed4e4d
Segmentation fault
I can't use gdb and I can't use winedbg.
Anyone know what is going on?
--
Bi
ssue for Michael Ost's particular problem is
to change that GENERIC_READ in ReadFile to FILE_READ_DATA (but
not until this fix is in place).
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
is largely irrelevant in this particular case. It's
the mapping from GENERIC to _... (e.g. FILE_) that is
relevant, and as Vitaliy pointed out, that is in the object
area.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On October 3, 2005 06:03 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
> Advice please. This looks a little too big to be done without
> discussion.
Ah well. Following the deathly hush and the fact that Vitaliy
appears to have volunteered I'll just forget about it then!
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAI
specific.
Any comments?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
n, for
testing purposes. I'd be quite willing to help out but it would
suit me best if you were to take the lead.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
e. By specifying
FILE_SHARE_READ the caller is permitting other calls to open the
file for reading.
We could (INCORRECTLY) read the bad current text to mean "During
this call if the file is opened for reading but the
FILE_SHARE_READ is not set then the call will fail."
Anyway, I'll have a quick look.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On February 23, 2005 10:41 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:50 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Does anyone know any site or book or something with a decent discussion
> > about the problems of the different threading models and their
> > implementatio
://www.dependencywalker.com/ , trust me.
>
> But probably http://www.pe-explorer.com/ is very useful, too...
>
> Or maybe even winedump...
>
> Andreas Mohr
Yes, but they aren't going to throw the arguments and return types out are
they? The only way to do that, surely, is disass
ut simply mkdir and if the error is already existed then fine.?
Unchecked, but something like:
if (mkdir (name, 0700) == -1)
{
if (errno != EEXIST) fatal_perror ("Ensuring directory %s", name)
}
>
>
> Changelog:
>
> * server/request.c
>
> Franc
and Samba (that I know of) seem to have found it necessary to
bypass/hack/modify/override them indicates to me that there is something to
understand.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
ine\Wine\Config key here on both Win98
> and Win2k. It failed.
>
> Both print the same error:
It ran fine on mine (running GenuineCheck.exe).
However that might be because I had already run it a couple of times before I
added the key.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On February 1, 2005 11:53 am, Sergey Efimoff wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2005, at 9:04 PM, Bill Medland wrote:
> >> I have windows binary-only, third-party .DLL library without any
> >> source
> >> files.
> >> I would like to use it in my unix-based project, which
e has to be
the main process.
> Bye.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
t as gcc and other
> compilers probably don't support this?
Um! What part of the code would be other than the pure ascii portion of utf-8?
The only bits I can think of are comments and literal strings. And certainly
on my system I can put utf-8 in them.
>
> Rob
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
> Web: http://www.T-Mobile.at
> --
> NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
> This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have
> received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and
> delete this email from your syste
runs fine except
> it doesn't display my unixODBC DSNs, nor can't it connect to one of the
> DSNs when entered manually.
>
> On 24. Jï 2005, at 15:29, Bill Medland wrote:
> > presume you are running a program called myprog.exe from the command
> > line.
> > You ty
esult of export WINEDEBUG=+odbc; wine ?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
; from the Unix command line to one of the configured databases works
> perfectly fine! But unfortunately I can't get unixODBC and wine working
> together! :(
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
Try running with
export WINEDEBUG=odbc
See if the debug tells you any more.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 20, 2005 07:37 am, Bill Medland wrote:
> On January 20, 2005 03:31 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:58:59PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > > On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:
On January 20, 2005 03:31 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:58:59PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > > > (Huw?)
> > &g
On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > (Huw?)
> >
> > Do I need to dig deeper to understand this or is there a defect in the
> > logic. If there are ttf fonts available does that mean a
On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > (Huw?)
> >
> > Do I need to dig deeper to understand this or is there a defect in the
> > logic. If there are ttf fonts available does that mean a
On January 18, 2005 02:04 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have also fixed (kinda) the issue Bill
> Medland was reporting where doing a CreateInstance for an IUnknown
> interface was a bit messed up (this is bad programming anyway as it
> doubles the number of RPC calls
of
fonts? Or add some sort of "Ignore these fonts" list in the Wine fonts area?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
009:trace:ole:RunningObjectTableImpl_Destroy ()
0009:trace:ole:DllMain (0x52db,0,0x1)
0009:trace:ole:DllMain 0x2d47 0x0 0x1
0010:fixme:ole:read_pipe Read only 0 of 4 bytes from 0xac.
0010:warn:ole:stub_dispatch_thread exiting with hres 80004005
0016:fixme:ole:read_pipe Read only 0
b_manager found 0x77e4fd90 for oid 2
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_ext_release removed 1 refs from 0x77e4fd90 (oid
2), rc is now 0
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_int_release after 1
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_int_release after 0
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_delete destroying 0x77e4fd90 (oid=2)
0016:tra
On January 11, 2005 08:02 am, Bill Medland wrote:
> Any idea what is going wrong in the OXID handling here?
See below for theory
>
> Is "a" the first thread of the new process? Is the problem that it should
> be "b"?
>
> (I've removed a
ented
000b:warn:ole:get_stub_manager_from_object Could not map OXID a to
apartment object
000b:trace:ole:register_ifstub constructing new stub manager
000b:warn:ole:register_ifstub Could not map OXID a to apartment object
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
It is specified for users of the API rather than for people rewriting
Windows. It allows the users to specify the threading model explicitly in
the code, even though doing so does not actually do anything.
In restrospect I think you are probably right that in the code we ought to do
that
on today if I have time, or tomorrow
> otherwise.
>
> Rob
I've done it;
(I wonder if the optimizer will replace it with "not apartment threaded" for
us)
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 10, 2005 11:08 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:56:30 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Minor typo correction and term expansion changes
>
> Bill, if that document was helpful I'll write some more docs for yo
finer point of C I missed here then please do enlighten me ...
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 5, 2005 05:59 am, Rob Shearman wrote:
> Bill Medland wrote:
> >Anyone any idea what is wrong here?
> >In particular any idea why the xCall occurs almost immediately before the
> >TMProxyImpl_Connect that would give it a channel to use?
> >
> >(The
On December 22, 2004 08:25 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh. I thought we wanted to do the same as Windows does!!!
> >
> > Don't ask me why but for some error codes (as detailed in the patch),
> > even thoug
On December 22, 2004 06:47 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bill Medland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My comments are probably not clear enough. That function isn't asking if
> > the error code is a valid error code (which is relevant to
> > FormatMessage). Actu
On December 21, 2004 10:50 pm, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Thanks for the feedback
> "Bill Medland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +RPC_STATUS RPC_ENTRY DceErrorInqTextW (unsigned long e, unsigned short
> > *b) +{
> > +DWORD count;
> > +if (accepta
On December 21, 2004 11:59 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 11:41 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
SNIP
>
> - Help us improve builtin DCOM (yay!)
> - Hack the registry and manually expand the strings so MSXML is happy
>
> If you're able to commit time to the first one
d so the msxml
stuff stops working. I suggest as a working hypothesis that the Win95/98
ole32 does not support the REG_EXPAND_SZ. (Does the Windows 98 Registry code
actually allow you to add a REG_EXPAND_SZ to the registry or doe it maybe
automatically do the expansion on the way into the regist
On December 18, 2004 08:10 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 07:46 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
> > 0013:trace:ole:listener_thread Process listener thread starting on
> > (\\.\pipe\WINE_OLE_StubMgr_00100011)
>
> ...
>
> > 0009:fixme:ole:PIPE_GetN
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
