On 2/7/08, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bang Jun-young wrote:
> > On 2/7/08, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> "Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> 18 hours passed, and it look
On 2/7/08, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Bang Jun-young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
> >
> > This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/200
18 hours passed, and it looks like Alexandre decided to ignore this...why?
This fix is required for Wine to be built with VC2005/2008 (although
Alexandre doesn't seem to care about it).
On 2/6/08, Bang Jun-young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason why this hasn't been committed?
>
On 2/1/08, Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The rules are as follows:
>
> * For case insensitive comparisons of 'windows strings', a Windows
>function must be used (stricmp() or similar).
In this case, KERNEL32 lstrcmpiA() would be more appropriate. In
general, using stricmp() in
To prove Wine is better than Vista:
1. Find a number of games that don't work with Vista but work fine with Wine.
2. Write a blog.
3. Everybody knows that Vista sucks.
Now a Vista user gets upset with the results, so he will:
1. Find a ton of games and apps that don't work with Wine but work
fin
Just out of curiousity, is there a special reason for you to use "Oct" as the
abbreviation for November?
On 11/10/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Results for today's git (plus my dde patch) are online at
> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/20071109/
>
> ole32/tests/marshall.c has always b
Hi,
I wonder how this has been possible so far:
static void __RPC_STUB dispatch_rpc(RPC_MESSAGE *msg)
{
struct dispatch_params *params;
APARTMENT *apt;
IPID ipid;
HRESULT hr;
RpcBindingInqObject(msg->Handle, &ipid);
TRACE("ipid = %s, iMethod = %d\n", debugstr_guid(&ipid), msg
