Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Another way of saying the same thing: I absolutely hate seeing
>> patches that fix some theoretical issue that no Linux apps will ever
>> care about.
> No, it is not theoretical, but it is mainly
> about a DOS games and an MS linker, as for
> me. The th
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 04:38:21PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Can someone repeat again what was wrong with the old ptrace
> > semantics before the initial change that caused all these complex
> > changes? It seemed to work well for years. How about we just
> > go back to the old state, rever
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a bit more involved than I'd like, since especially the "popf" case
> just is pretty complex, but I'd love to hear whether it works.
>
> NOTE NOTE NOTE! I've tested it, but only on one small test-case, so it
> might be totally broken in many ways